Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Supply Mr. Speaker, the hon. member does not seem to understand the simple arithmetic that the size of the federal government today is less than it has been for 50 years. I could perhaps illuminate history by describing the meeting to which he referred. After the meeting the National P
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, I have two things to say. First, projected surpluses are calculated by economists from banks and other institutions who have no political reasons to hide anything. Second, the hon. member continues to insist that he is the only one who can make such brilliant foreca
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, our government just lowered employment insurance contributions for the eighth consecutive year. This means that, compared to 1994, employers and employees will save $6.8 billion this year. Not only did we do that, but we also increased payments.
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, it would seem that the member does not understand that the forecasts used by the government are those made by economists. These are not political forecasts of surpluses and deficits, they are forecasts by other economists. His forecasts of surpluses of $13 billion
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, on the question of Canada using the U.S. dollar, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance have stated with extraordinary clarity that we are not going to do that. I do not know one person in the Liberal caucus who advocates it. The member for Regina--Qu'Appell
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, I think that there have been a number of recent changes to the EI plan the hon. member does not want to mention. As far as premiums go, as I have already said, they have been reduced for eight years running, so that employees and employers are now paying $6.8 billion
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, I certainly agree with the hon. member that productivity is of central importance in the longer term to rising living standards in the country, but I cannot understand why he says that we have not addressed the issue. Let me give the member four very quick examples.
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, with all due respect, the member opposite reflects what might be called an accountant's mentality. One famous economist said some years ago, perhaps referring to accountants, that it was better to be approximately right than precisely wrong. The home heating subsidy
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Supply Mr. Speaker, my colleague across the aisle said that he was in favour of more foreign aid. That is my view and the view of our Prime Minister. That seems a little strange coming from his party because I had not realized that was its position. Would his party be in support of add
December 4th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Employment Insurance Mr. Speaker, the hon. member should know that these surpluses are fictitious. He should know that employees and employers received $6.8 billion through reductions in the amount of their contributions. He should also know that improvements were made to the program. Finally, he sho
December 10th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Employment Insurance Mr. Speaker, the hon. member should know that, as was recommended by the auditor general, these contributions are put into the government's general revenues.
December 10th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
Employment Insurance Mr. Speaker, all hon. members should know that it was in 1986 that the auditor general recommended that the separate fund be abolished. This was under the Conservatives. It was only after this government came to office that the auditor general's recommendation was implemented.
December 10th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
The Economy Mr. Speaker, the revenue went to the consolidated revenue fund. If the member wishes to hear more, he has approximately 60 minutes and 30 seconds to wait.
December 10th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
The Budget Mr. Speaker, I have two questions for the member. First, almost all of his remarks are based on a fictitious surplus of about $13 billion. Given that he is the only economist in the country with such a far-fetched forecast, my question for him is the following: why should the gov
December 11th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal
The Budget Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is complaining because we did not do his party's $10 billion stimulus when in fact the stimulus we provided was on the order of $26 billion. The point is that because of actions taken a year ago we have $17 billion in tax cuts in this year alone. That
December 11th, 2001House debate
John McCallumLiberal