Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 5311-5325 of 5834
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  Are we on the preamble or the short title? I believe the preamble would be the first, would it not?

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Then after that, the preamble.

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'll be speaking on the preamble. As far as the short title goes, it's—

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Well, clause 1 is the short title, as I just said. I will be speaking on the preamble after we deal with this. On the short title, it says: This Act may be cited as the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act. That's what we're talking about. The only point I would make is that

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  So we're talking less than 24 hours ago. This substantial clause, a new clause added to Bill C-288, was introduced less than 24 hours ago, and Mr. Godfrey is trying to convince this committee that it was well thought out, wasn't on the fly, and was presented here with great thoug

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. When did the clerk's office receive this amendment? It is a substantial amendment, a new clause. When did the clerk's office receive it?

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Do you have an approximate time?

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  In response to Mr. Bigras' comment, you don't do things like this on the fly; you do them properly. As I said in my comments, should this reporting for proper accountability on the environment include pollution and air quality? Should we be looking at water quality and the poll

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. In response to the two comments made, first from Mr. Bigras, absolutely, I do agree that Bill C-30 is far superior. Bill C-288 does not meet the targets that Canadians want in dealing with greenhouse gas emissions and pollutants. That's why I'm so excited a

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Two days ago we had the commissioner here. She was one of the witnesses. This was not brought up; she was not questioned on this. So here we are with this on-the-fly type of legislation, which of course the Liberals are known for. One of the reasons the witnesses shared with us i

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  I'd like a recorded vote.

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Mr. Chair, I have a point of order. We have an environmental NGO that is coaching the Liberal Party. I just want to get a ruling. Is that appropriate?

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'll try asking the question through you to Mr. Rodriguez again. We are on clause 5. The title of clause 5 is “Climate Change Plan”, and there are a number of parts to clause 5. They have laid out their plan, and my question is again about this plan. What

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  On a point of order, Mr. Chairman, you've asked us to be civil. At this point, I'd ask, through you, are the comments of Mr. Rodriguez being civil? I would think not. We need to cooperate. Please keep the comments civil.

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee  Well, did he finish?

December 7th, 2006Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative