Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 826-840 of 931
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, we know why the member for Kingston and the Islands is not asked. It is because the Liberals keep a good database. The Liberal list provides them the information they need to be able to make those appointments, as we found out during the last session. To the matte

February 4th, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I thank the member opposite for her comments and echo her condolences to the families and friends of the victims. Can the member explain why Mr. Gallese, who has killed before and was deemed a threat specifically to women, and the member has identified that this was

February 4th, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, one of the members opposite talked about sovereignty. I know the member for Lethbridge commented on what we lose in terms of sovereignty when we have the U.S. making decisions about who we can and cannot have free trade agreements with. My question is about sovere

February 3rd, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act  I wonder if the member for Lethbridge, in spite of the interruptions, can give us some comment on that.

February 3rd, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. While we are on the subject, the member for Spadina—Fort York used some language that would also fall under the same category addressed by his colleague. I am just wondering if you, Madam Speaker, would like to give him the same opport

February 3rd, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Privacy  Mr. Speaker, the government revealed that 38 departments and agencies mishandled sensitive information more than 5,000 times last year. Clearly this is not a one-off. This is a pattern across the Liberal government. Information was mismanaged and misplaced. It is clear the Libera

February 3rd, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, we have arrived at this deal and there are so many questions, but not as to why Conservatives might have concerns. I think I have laid those out. We know that there is a lot that we do not know. We know we have asked the government for 51 successive days for an eco

January 31st, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, truly it is a flawed process. Not only were the opposition and Canadians not given an opportunity to give input and help the government set its priorities throughout the negotiations, but the deal has been signed and we still do not know what is in it. We are asked

January 31st, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, the member's point is very well taken. It is very concerning. When aluminum sourced from China can be delivered to Mexico, melted down, re-formed and then shipped across the country, it hurts the Canadian aluminum industry and it hurts the producers who use it.

January 31st, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, it is a pleasure to rise today to talk about this important agreement with our most important trading partners. It has been 51 days since we, the official opposition, the Conservatives, who are very concerned and seized with the economic future of our country, re

January 31st, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Privilege  She lied.

January 29th, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Ethics  Mr. Speaker, last week, we learned that under the Prime Minister, Canada has fallen to a 10-year low on the global corruption index. We know that the Prime Minister was found guilty of breaking the Conflict of Interest Act. We know he used his office to circumvent, undermine and

January 29th, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Questions on the Order Paper  With regard to the March 2019 leak of information related to the Supreme Court nomination process: (a) did the government investigate the leak, and, if not, why not; (b) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, who investigated the leak; (c) was the leak referred to the RCMP and, if

January 27th, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Questions on the Order Paper  With regard to the SNC-Lavalin affair: (a) what are the details of all correspondence or other communication received by the government from the RCMP on this matter, including (i) dates, (ii) senders, (iii) recipients, (iv) titles or subject matters, (v) summary of content, (vi)

January 27th, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative

Government Contracts  Mr. Speaker, as a result of the Liberal government's performance in the previous Parliament, marred by ethical breaches and cover-ups, the Prime Minister has mandated that his ministers hold themselves to the highest ethical standards. However, now we know that they are in the pr

January 27th, 2020House debate

Michael BarrettConservative