Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 121-135 of 1060
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Criminal Code  Madam Speaker, it is true that the Conservatives supported certain amendments at committee. We helped improve a terrible bill to make it a slightly less terrible bill. The member cites red flag laws. I note that section 117 of the Criminal Code already provides law enforcement w

May 17th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Criminal Code  Madam Speaker, I will be splitting my time with the hon. member for Banff—Airdrie. I rise in strong opposition to Bill C-21, the latest ideological, evidence-free attack by the Liberals on law-abiding firearms owners. Canada is facing a crime wave after eight years of this disa

May 17th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I rise on behalf of the Conservative members of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs to table two dissenting reports in response to the main reports of the committee in respect of the reports of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the pro

May 17th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Amendments to the Standing Orders  Mr. Speaker, I rise to speak on Motion No. 79, introduced by the hon. member for Elmwood—Transcona. The motion would make substantial changes to the Standing Orders pertaining to confidence votes and the prorogation of Parliament. With respect to confidence votes, it would make

May 12th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Amendments to the Standing Orders  Mr. Speaker, I know the hon. member for Elmwood—Transcona certainly brings a lot of knowledge on questions of procedure. My issue with the motion is largely one of the process that the member has chosen. Many aspects of his motion are seemingly novel, in terms of what he is prop

May 12th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Democratic Institutions  Mr. Speaker, that answer is an insult to Chinese Canadians. This government expelled one Beijing diplomat after they got caught doing nothing. It gets worse. According to national security sources, CSIS has provided this government with a list of other Beijing diplomats identifi

May 12th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Democratic Institutions  Mr. Speaker, for three years, the current government knew that a diplomat in Beijing's Toronto consulate was spying on Chinese Canadians and sending information back to Beijing's secret police. At the same time, the government knew that the very same diplomat was targeting a sitt

May 12th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Jury Service  Mr. Speaker, jurors play an integral role in our justice system, often at a considerable personal cost, from being away from family and work to suffering from mental health issues after a difficult trial. Nothing can fully prepare someone for jury service. Earlier this year, a

May 10th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Privilege  Madam Speaker, in short, the answer to my colleague's question is yes. Do members know who was intimidated? It is not the member for Winnipeg North. It is the member for Wellington—Halton Hills, and for two years the Prime Minister covered it up.

May 8th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Privilege  Madam Speaker, I could not agree more with the member for Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley. The diplomat should have been expelled immediately and the government had all the tools at its disposal. Article 9 of the Vienna Convention gives the government the unfettered

May 8th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Privilege  Madam Speaker, the member is absolutely right that it is not only the Beijing regime that is a threat in terms of interfering in our sovereignty and our democracy. The Canadian security establishment, including CSIS, has been very clear that by far the biggest threat emanates fro

May 8th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Privilege  Madam Speaker, I have every reason to believe that the Prime Minister did know. After all, the Prime Minister's national security adviser informed the member for Wellington—Halton Hills that the national security adviser to the PCO and all relevant departments had been briefed an

May 8th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Privilege  Madam Speaker, if we had a competent Prime Minister and a competent government that took national security seriously, two things would have happened following that July 21 CSIS assessment. First, the member for Wellington—Halton Hills would have been immediately informed that a B

May 8th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Privilege  Madam Speaker, the member does raise a point, but I would submit that, under the government, the pendulum is way over on the other side: no transparency and no sunlight. The advice of CSIS to the Prime Minister has been that in order to combat foreign interference, there needs to

May 8th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative

Privilege  Madam Speaker, I rise to speak to the motion put forward by my colleague, the member for Wellington—Halton Hills, on the Speaker's ruling and prima facie determination that the member's privileges were breached as a result of tactics of intimidation employed by a diplomat at Beij

May 8th, 2023House debate

Michael CooperConservative