Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 661-675 of 910
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Fairness at the Pumps Act  Mr. Speaker, there is a whole variety of different things that governments can do to improve the lives of Canadians, and we are always looking for ways to make further improvements, but in this case we are focused very seriously on the measurement of products that Canadian consum

May 10th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Fairness at the Pumps Act  Mr. Speaker, this has been an issue that has been raised before. I know that John Manley looked at this when he was industry minister under the previous Liberal government and, with the advice of experts, he decided to stick with the global standard in terms of temperature contro

May 10th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Fairness at the Pumps Act  Mr. Speaker, I will deal with a couple of the assertions by the hon. member. First, in terms of the timeframe, we are talking about two years and, with a situation like this, one of the most important things we can do is get it right. It is pretty technical in terms of the aspec

May 10th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Fairness at the Pumps Act  Mr. Speaker, in terms of the small number of Canadians who the member says this change will affect, I want to point out that the number we are talking about in terms of the cost of this inaccuracy just at the gas pumps alone, and, of course, there are several industries that this

May 10th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Fairness at the Pumps Act  Mr. Speaker, on May 12, 2008, the former minister of industry, the hon. member for Calgary Centre-North stood in the House and responded to a question. The question had to do with media reports that an alarmingly high percentage of gas pumps across the country were not accurately

May 10th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

The Economy  Mr. Speaker, the difference between our government's approach to the economy and the Liberal approach could not be more clear. Our government believes that low taxes fuel job creation and economic growth. That is why since forming government we have reduced taxes for families,

May 7th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I would point out that under the Investment Canada Act, the changes that were made were largely put forward by a panel of renowned experts from across this country. These changes have been widely accepted as ones that would benefit Canada significantly economically,

April 28th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I am sure that the dozens of Canadians who are tuned in right now are having a hard time hearing my answer, because they are laughing hysterically at the NDP member's speech on economics. Let us take a look at what the experts have had to say about Canada's approach

April 28th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, the hon. member attributes the results of a global economic slowdown to changes in the Investment Canada Act. I would note that as this global economic slowdown has affected countries around the world, commentators worldwide have pointed to Canada as a leader because

April 28th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, once again I would reiterate what I said in my speech. Specific criteria are used to define net benefit to Canada. Virtually every economist in the world would point to foreign investment as a key driver of growth, better jobs, and better quality of life in terms o

April 28th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, let me begin by stating that foreign investment plays an important role in the Canadian economy. Foreign investors bring with them knowledge, capabilities and technology that can increase the productivity, efficiency and competitiveness of Canadian firms. These inve

April 28th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

House debate  Mr. Speaker, what is not clear is what the hon. member is actually asking. He has asked two completely different things, using two completely different sets of numbers. Today he refers to the fifth report to Canadians, which uses wording such as “--will create over 300 jobs and

April 26th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

House debate  Mr. Speaker, it is interesting that today in his question, the member for Charlottetown uses the wording “will create over 300 jobs and inject about $30 million into the economy”. I would note that when asking questions in the House, he used different wording. He said, “received

April 26th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

House debate  Madam Speaker, let me reiterate the facts for the benefit of all members. The University of Prince Edward Island is receiving funding under KIP to update the essential physical infrastructure on several of its campus buildings. The total cost of these upgrades is $4 million, of

April 19th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative

House debate  Madam Speaker, I do wish to clarify questions surrounding the level of funding provided to the province of P.E.I. under the knowledge infrastructure program and, in particular, certain numbers reported in the fifth report to Canadians. The knowledge infrastructure program is pr

April 19th, 2010House debate

Mike LakeConservative