Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 2334
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance  Mr. Speaker, while I thank my hon. colleague for her comments, I do have some confusion with respect to coming at this from the perspective of a young Canadian and being worried about the debt and deficit. That seemed to be the focus of the member's speech. I have with me a repo

January 31st, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Finance  Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for his passion and commitment to this issue. I have a quick question with respect to the question that was just brought forward. There is confusion. In banking and business terms, the concept of investment is a very sound one, where one co

February 1st, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Finance  Mr. Speaker, I have one comment and one question. I hesitate to bring up employment insurance considering the amount of money that has been sloshed over from that fund over the years, paying down all sorts of different things except going to workers. I actually do not come from

February 1st, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Canada Elections Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleagues for probably one of the most enjoyable debates of the day, the most informative at the very least. Not to comment on the excitement of prebudgetary consultations but this debate is clearly engaging some members in the House in bringing before us

February 1st, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, our party extends its condolences to the family as well. My question, to switch topics for a moment, is for the Minister of Natural Resources. After more than a decade of dithering and stalling on the Kyoto plan, we now find ourselves scrambling at the 11th hour an

February 9th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

The Environment  Wonderful, Mr. Speaker, some more dithering and stalling. I am wondering if the reason the Liberal Party has hired a Newfoundland comedian to promote its Kyoto plan is because the plan is a joke. Will the minister stand in the House today and commit to Canadians that there will

February 9th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Department of International Trade Act  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the hon. member's comments and words about the need to study this proposition from the government. I wonder if, as part of that analysis, the member would consider the factor of acquisitions in Canada and the screen that we obviously need to put acquisi

February 9th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, earlier the parliamentary secretary commented that this was a day to celebrate, as the Kyoto accord comes into practice. Clearly, this is a humiliation for Canada in our lack of leadership on this issue. We have no plan and we have no leadership whatsoever on climate

February 16th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

The Environment  Clearly, Mr. Speaker, the minister's idea of consultation is continuing to ask the people of British Columbia until he gets the answer that he wants. Seventy-five per cent of British Columbians said no and 100% of the first nations said no to lifting the moratorium. The minister

February 16th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Supply  moved: That, in the opinion of the House, the government should recognize the public health impacts of smog and the failure of voluntary emission standards by legislating mandatory improvements to vehicle efficiency in all classes of light duty vehicles sold in Canada. Mr. Spea

February 17th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Supply  Absolutely shameful. We think we have found a way that makes sense for Canadians and the auto sector to step into the new economy and into a future that we can be proud of for all Canadians. Some people dispute the seriousness of smog. I would like to quote a few numbers for me

February 17th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Supply  Waiting for Godot and others. We might need to rename this Liberal Party. Many people say that we should not have mandatory regulations because this will hurt the auto sector, that this will drive jobs away from Canada. Drive jobs away to where? We know that California is looki

February 17th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Supply  Madam Speaker, I thank the member for his excitable question. The motion has brought forward a great amount of ire. I am looking to the motion to find out where the great amount of fear is and the specifics of what the member is describing. The member asked what our plans are an

February 17th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Supply  Madam Speaker, that is an excellent question and a fair observation. The most important aspect of the motion is that it creates the framework for the negotiations between the Government of Canada and the auto sector to say that voluntary standards are no longer an option, that i

February 17th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Supply  Mr. Speaker, it is interesting that the government is asking me to analyze the effectiveness of its own policies. Clearly if the plans that the hon. member mentioned were effective, we would not have had a 20% increase instead of the promised 20% decrease. We talk about the plan

February 17th, 2005House debate

Nathan CullenNDP