Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 2116-2130 of 2334
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, Canadians need to know the opinion of the environment minister about a so-called scientist who is helping to raise cash for Victoria area Conservatives. Dr. Tim Ball, a known climate change skeptic, has said that Kyoto was a political solution to a non-existent scie

September 20th, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, I think the new government learned too many lessons from the old government. Repeating the same lines day in and day out does nothing to fight the effects of climate change. Tim Ball thinks that global warming is actually good for Canada saying: --in ways too nume

September 20th, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Canada Transportation Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague, the member for Welland, for his comments. In looking through the act, as a representative of northwestern British Columbia, we have a terminus in Prince Rupert where many of the trains and goods pass through, particularly to the Asian marke

September 19th, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Privilege  The members of the official opposition can continue to heckle and prevent me from simply stating a case. It is quite remarkable. --the Standing Orders shall apply so far as may be applicable, except the Standing Orders as to the election of a Speaker, seconding of motions, lim

June 22nd, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, it is a somewhat sad moment as I have to rise on this question of privilege. Obviously I do not take this course of action very often in this place, yet what occurred at the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development yesterday causes me and others

June 22nd, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Privilege  Being partisan is not part of the business of this, but the travesty of what happened at the committee raises larger questions surrounding the fundamental rights of a member in committee. I do not dispute the notion around here that “the minority has its say and then the majorit

June 22nd, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Privilege  This point seems to cause incredible derision. I note that if the members of the committee do not agree with my motion they can vote against it, as is clearly their right. I believe that this place is for reasoned debate and informed decision, but what happened yesterday in the

June 22nd, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Privilege  It seems that the continuation of the prohibition of my right to speak is being enacted yet again by both the official opposition and the government trying to heckle down what is a reasonable point. When a motion is brought forward and is in order, as was ruled by the Conservat

June 22nd, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I have a fair, direct and simple question for the hon. member. He talked about the need for a new breath of fresh air and accountability. While there are aspects of the bill that move us some way forward, I wonder, in a very specific and simple way, with the appoin

June 21st, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, I listened with interest to my colleague. I know he has a number of opinions and some integrity on the issue of accountability. At the very end of his speech, he talked about accountability and the power of committees. He talked about the important work done at commi

June 21st, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Federal Accountability Act  Mr. Speaker, there has been a lot of talk these days about who is dancing with whom and who is sleeping with whom. Canadians could be forgiven for thinking we are running a soap opera here rather than the House of Commons. I would like the member to comment on what took place i

June 21st, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Phthalate Control Act  Mr. Speaker, the precautionary principle is already in Canadian law. Our central piece of environmental legislation is currently under review at committee. We spent an entire day and more in conversation around the precautionary principle. When first introduced to the Canadian En

June 20th, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Phthalate Control Act  Mr. Speaker, I can keep this brief. The great importance of the debate we are having now is the need for a committee review to actually open up the discussion. Of the three, BBP is the first. It is specifically banned from children's toys and anything meant to be used in childr

June 20th, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

Phthalate Control Act  moved that Bill C-307, An Act to prohibit the use of benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in certain products and to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, be read the second time and referred to a committee.

June 20th, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, never mind convincing Canadians that the Liberals were a disaster when it came to the environment. We all know that already. Never mind even convincing fellow parliamentarians, the minister cannot even convince her own staff that she actually cares about climate chan

June 20th, 2006House debate

Nathan CullenNDP