Foreign Political Interference, Violence or Intimidation  Mr. Speaker, I commend the member for Surrey—Newton for bringing forward this important motion. As he mentioned, it has the support of all the recognized parties in the House. It has been seconded by members of Parliament from each of the parties. This is an important initiative

Foreign Political Interference, Violence or Intimidation   into effect immediately. I would also like to thank the hon. member from the NDP for seconding this, as well as the NDP for supporting the motion.

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act  . The reality is that we saw Conservatives filibustering this bill, Bill C-20, repeatedly at the public safety committee, for months. Every time we showed up at the public safety committee to actually go through the bill, we ended up going through some motion, another dilatory motion

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act   that they would get back pay if the allegation was unfounded. The Liberals defeated them. That is why it is so important to have debates on this in the House. I would draw the attention of the House to the parliamentary secretary himself. He is saying that these are ridiculous motions

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act  Mr. Speaker, where we left off this morning, Conservatives were saying that they wanted the bill to pass. In fact, they even chastened the Liberals for not passing the bill. Just prior to question period, I asked for unanimous consent to move beyond this dilatory motion, delay

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act   is that report stage amendments normally have to be substantive to be considered and the fact that we are considering right now deleting the short title, which is a meaningless motion that is only designed to delay the legislation, is something that really saddens me. We know

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act  There is one motion in amendment standing on the Notice Paper for the report stage of Bill C-20. Motion No. 1 will be debated and voted upon. I will now put Motion No. 1 to the House.

Business of the House   the parties and if you seek it, I believe you will find unanimous consent for the following motion: That, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, during the debate pursuant to Standing Order 66 on Motion No. 54 to concur in the eighth report of the Standing

Membership of Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs  All those opposed to the hon. member's moving the motion will please say nay. It is agreed. The House has heard the terms of the motion. All those opposed to the motion will please say nay. (Motion agreed to)

Impact Assessment Act  The question is on the motion. If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate

Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act  There are nine motions in amendment standing on the Notice Paper for the report stage of Bill C-49. Motions Nos. 1 to 9 will not be selected by the Chair because they could have been presented in committee. There being no motions at report stage, the House will now proceed

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act   leader from the New Democratic Party. In fact, the member will be very interested to hear that it is a relatively common practice to bring about amendments at report stage. The member himself did so in an example from 2016, which I have in front of me, where he moved a motion

Human Resources committee  Okay. I see no further discussion. Mrs. Gray's motion is clear. I have agreed that it is in order. Madam Clerk, we'll go to a recorded vote on the motion of Mrs. Gray. (Motion negatived: nays 7; yeas 4) The motion has been defeated. Committee members, there are just

Justice committee   irrelevant in the context of the Supreme Court decision, to hold up Mr. Housefather's study on anti-Semitism, which is urgent and timely. That's what's happening. I want to be crystal clear: If we do not study the motion on anti-Semitism, which should begin on Monday, we're not going

Justice committee  , we begin Mr. Housefather's study on anti-Semitism. Look at your phone, look at the headlines and turn on the television. You will see that this is a massive issue across the country right now. That's why we have agreed as a committee, unanimously, to study Mr. Housefather's motion