Justice committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. I was going to make that very point. We are doing clause-by-clause. This motion that Mr. Moore is proposing is out of order. There's a very simple path forward to get on with this study, which we all agree is top priority—very important—and which

Justice committee  I've already said I can't entertain that motion until I finish with the clause-by-clause. There's really nothing to rule. Thank you for all kinds of advice here beside me. I've already asked, shall clause 1 carry? Until that is determined, I can't entertain any other motions

Justice committee  On that, I think your ruling is that we have to deal with clause 1 before you can deal with the motion, not that we have to deal with clause-by-clause. We could have a 300-clause bill, and not being able to entertain motions until it's over would be problematic. I have

Environment committee   of this, and we saw it in writing after. Then last, as it relates to the motion of privilege, frankly, it's only the members on this side of the table who have addressed the motion. We've talked about politics and we've talked about carbon taxes, but when I look at page 2 of the most recent

Pharmacare Act   will propose at the next sitting a motion to allot a specific number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of proceedings at the said stage.

Impact Assessment Act  The House resumed consideration of the motion that Bill C-375, An Act to amend the Impact Assessment Act (federal-provincial agreements), be read the second time and referred to a committee.

Impact Assessment Act  , in accordance with the unanimously expressed will of the Quebec National Assembly. More than two years ago, on April 13, 2022, to be precise, elected officials from all political parties represented in the Quebec National Assembly unanimously adopted a motion asserting the primacy

Impact Assessment Act  The House resumed from March 18 consideration of the motion that Bill C-375, an act to amend the Impact Assessment Act (federal-provincial agreements), be read the second time and referred to a committee.

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act   supported a motion, moved by another party, which sought exactly that, a debate over a title.

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act   with countless time allocation motions and restrictions of the ability for members to speak to legislation here in this chamber. Really, what is this bill all about? It renames an existing body that already exists for the RCMP. It obviously expands upon that, but most importantly, it does

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act   on a motion just a few days later that very closely reflected the Conservative proposal, that is, to toughen penalties and provide the necessary tools. That is exactly what we were hoping for. Auto theft is a major problem for border services. There are also illegal weapons, which I

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act  , why would it oppose having the bill go through automatically through a unanimous consent motion, as the NDP proposed, and have it go directly into third reading? The Conservatives said no. Would the member, today, make a commitment now that he would be prepared to see it start

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act  , and it is their fault that it has not passed. They held this bill up for months in the public safety committee by bringing forward meaningless motions, constantly, so that we could not actually get to the nuts and bolts of the bill. I spoke earlier about the many amendments and improvements

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act  The House resumed consideration of Bill C-20, An Act establishing the Public Complaints and Review Commission and amending certain Acts and statutory instruments, as reported (with amendments) from the committee, and of Motion No. 1.

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act  All those opposed to the hon member's moving the motion will please say nay.