Justice committee  Madam Chair, is it your ruling that this committee could not decide to study the anti-Semitism motion on Monday?

Justice committee  Subject to and in compliance with your ruling, we've dealt with that amendment. I would like to now move a motion, irrespective of any misunderstanding of decisions that were made in the past, that this committee begin our study on anti-Semitism on Monday and on Thursday

Justice committee  I have. I'm not going to allow this particular motion on specific dates, because I know from speaking to committee members that I cannot give a specific date for the study. This is because there are things we have to decide—

Justice committee  Madam Chair, my motion is absolutely in order. We could decide as a committee.... Boy, there are a lot of—

Amendments to the Standing Orders  Mr. Speaker, I am quite encouraged by the member's motion. However, there are a number of questions and thoughts I would like to share with the member. To start off, we have to look at what we have witnessed over the years, or at least what I have witnessed, which

Justice committee  Mr. Moore, I think we have to complete what we're completing first, before I can entertain a motion on another topic, so just allow me to—

Justice committee  , then that is the law of the land. I think hearing what Mr. Maloney just said reinforces my position. I've heard from Mr. Fortin on his motion. I'm unable to support his motion, because as the chair said, should his motion pass, then our Conservative motion could not be dealt with. I don't want

Human Resources committee  With respect, I do not see how that strengthens the section. The proposed motion seeks to remove “whose services were used contrary to subsection 94(4)”. You are saying “to any other person”. What is your definition of the word “other”? It can be interpreted in various ways

Human Resources committee   to give more spacing to avoid any possible sound issues. Again, keep your earpiece on the allotted location. Today's meeting is taking place pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the committee on February 22, 2024. The committee is beginning its clause-by-clause

Amendments to the Standing Orders  Mr. Speaker, I rise to speak in strong support of Motion No. 109, which was introduced by my colleague, the member for Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston. The motion would instruct the procedure and House affairs committee to undertake a study with respect to a series of proposed

Privilege   was bugged, as apparently discovered by Mr. Ed Broadbent and as reported to the House by Mr. David Lewis. The matter was of such urgency that Mr. Lewis was able to rise without having given the proper notice and without even having the relevant privilege motion in readiness. Mr. Lewis

Finance committee   for drafting the clauses, and we're still fiddling with some subamendments, which they've also had from all members of the committee for a couple of weeks. I also note, just out of interest, that the ways and means motion that was tabled today amends this bill. I find it really convenient

Finance committee   that was just held by committee members and the motion that was adopted on BQ-2, I see very little or nothing left in terms of substantive differences between NDP-6 and the motion that was just adopted.

Environment committee  . This is a summary of models, just like the third iteration we got. That is not what the motion said. The motion asked specifically for complete information on a number of pieces. I understand this is of a partisan nature, but I'll go back to my earlier comments. When this government came

Environment committee  Thank you, colleagues, for all the valuable input. It gave us some time to think about a lot of what's gone on here, especially since November, when we first put the motion forward. The bottom line is that we're simply asking for information, for a model to prove