Canadian Bill Of Rights   the Prime Minister will stand by his words and give full support to this motion. Finally in 1981 Pierre Trudeau made a last gasp attempt to include property rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In the end, after 13 long and frustrating years, property rights were left

Property Rights   and Reformers. Property rights is an issue which transcends partisan politics. Property rights were first protected in Canada by John Diefenbaker with the passage of the Canadian bill of rights. Both Pierre Elliott Trudeau and our current Prime Minister argued forcefully without success

Supply   in this area of jurisdiction. To put it more plainly, the jurisdiction proposed in the motion is not a matter for the federal government through the criminal law, that is section 91 (27), but, rather, concerns property and civil rights in the province, or section 92 (13). Therefore

Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms  moved: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should consider the advisability of amending section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, according to the amending formula provided for in section 38 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which amendment would

Cultural Property Export And Import Act   eventually amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Do we not think the public has a right to know what they are paying and giving up for the so-called works of art or donated papers? Former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau also received a tax break by declaring his papers. In 1993-94

Property Rights   and Freedoms included property rights but they were deleted in political bargaining. Perhaps particularly meaningful to my liberal colleagues across the floor, the Right Hon. Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau wrote in 1983: "I reiterate the full support of my government for the passage

Property Rights  . Pierre Elliott Trudeau, who had also been a Minister of Justice, proposed the adoption of a charter designed to ensure the constitutional protection of certain rights including, of course, the right to enjoyment of property. As you know, that motion was rejected. In 1978, some

Property Rights   in this country. For most of our history the common law and its protection of the right to own property withstood any attempt to undermine it. Unfortunately what wise men create clever men can undo. And so it was here. The Right Hon. Pierre Elliot Trudeau neither fully understood nor cared

Supply   and the apportionment of debt or, as it says in the bill, apportionment of property and debts? I will start with the first item: currency. What criteria will be applied to determine the currency to be used in a sovereign Quebec? Sovereignists were part of the Bélanger-Campeau Commission, although

Supply   it? And if it does, for how long? In preparing for this speech I could not help but recall two formative pieces of Canadian literary work, The National Dream and The Last Spike . Pierre Berton's comprehensive works on CP Rail and the line of steel that brought my home province of British

Pearson International Airport Agreements Act   latitude to compensate those who might have lost when this process of privatization was halted. Why not get right to the bottom of this question? It could prove useful to deal with similar cases in the future, because we must not lose sight of the fact that in many cases, the political

Supply   to construct a process to try and make some changes to the act. He also told them that it would not be a waste of time because he believes that he has a member of Parliament who will go into the House of Commons and represent his and his students' wishes to Ottawa. He is right

Pearson International Airport Agreements Act   would interfere with the right to privacy. Under the Conservative government, a bill stating the guiding principles behind a lobbyists registration system was drafted. It was based on Bill C-82, known today as the Lobbyists Registration Act, hereinafter called Bill C-44, which

Pearson International Airport Agreements Act  Mr. Speaker, as you can well imagine, I too am going to speak on Bill C-22, because apparently, our colleagues across the floor have not yet understood how essential and urgent it is to have a royal commission of inquiry to get right to the bottom of this matter. I am going

Pearson International Airport Agreements Act   in its proper context, clause 3 provides that the agreements which have been concluded: are hereby declared not to have come into force and to have no legal effect.Moreover, clause 4 says: For greater certainty, all undertakings, obligations, liabilities, estates, rights, titles