Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Public Safety committee Thanks very much, Lorne, and thanks to the committee and to the chair for having us here today. As Lorne noted, we're proposing a series of relatively minor amendments to Bill C-3 that incorporate these key objections that Lorne has raised. We have tabled a document with you th
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee That's pretty much it.
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee The issue of what's in the possession of the Government of Canada is a crucial one. SIRC has a statutory right to everything except cabinet confidences. What is in the possession of CSIS, though, will vary. I can only tell you this based on hearsay, never having seen it. My unde
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee Thanks very much for the question. The first point to note is that Bill C-3 right now doesn't affirmatively close the door to continued access. It leaves it in the discretion of the judge. A similar rule in the United Kingdom has produced virtually the absence of access. There
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee It's less than three years, probably two years.
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee That's true, in the sense that in terms of the obligation they have, the SIRC counsel have a sort of bifurcated obligation. Certainly they are there to serve as the arm, if you will, of the committee member in question; yet they also, in the course of serving that role, serve the
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee Two changes are on deck right now, as Lorne mentioned. Now, in the new rules that will govern special advocate procedures, there's a more emphatic obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence. There's an affirmative obligation on the government now to reveal all relevant informati
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee The House of Lords decision was a challenge that, amongst other things, looked at the use of special advocates in what in the U.K. are called control orders, which are basically a form of house arrest. The House of Lords, on the whole, said that special advocates are a compromi
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Public Safety committee On the first point, on the issue of professional responsibility, right now the bill says the individual is not in a solicitor-client relationship. So there's no solicitor-client relationship between the special advocate and the individual concerned, which begs the question, if it
November 29th, 2007Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee Thanks very much, Mr. Reid, and thanks to the committee for having us. The purpose of the foreign policy practicum for this year was to examine issues surrounding Omar Khadr from two perspectives. The first was to document as clearly, concisely, and completely as we could the fa
May 26th, 2008Committee meeting
Professor Craig Forcese
Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee Those are our submissions. I think what we have demonstrated in the course of our report is that Omar can be repatriated and be charged under Canadian law in a variety of manners. His long and arduous incarceration and his youth at the time these alleged offences took place would
May 26th, 2008Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee Let me take a stab at it. The first thing to note is from the juxtaposition of the Canadian response to the incarceration of a citizen at Guantanamo with those of our allies. Omar Khadr is the only western national still in custody in Guantanamo Bay, as you know. In the first hal
May 26th, 2008Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee I'd be prepared and content to go to court and argue that the omission--that is, the failure to intervene in these circumstances--would violate the Charter of Rights.
May 26th, 2008Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee Do you mind if I respond in English?
May 26th, 2008Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese
Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee Sean, would you like to take a shot?
May 26th, 2008Committee meeting
Prof. Craig Forcese