Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Industry committee As the Minister indicated, the purpose of the bill is to modernize the act. In so far as possible, there has been attempt to maintain some level of consistency among federal corporate statutes. In this respect, I have borrowed the approach contained in the Canada Corporations Ac
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee As it has been pointed out, when time comes to establish this classification, in practice, it becomes extremely difficult to know in which classification you fit. Increasingly, not for profits are operating at various levels and conducting a different type of activities. The desi
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee The bill aims to allow any individual to incorporate a non-profit organization at the federal level. Further to that, it would have to follow established rules. However, there would be no oversight as detailed as what you've referred to. I would reiterate that this type of appr
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee No. The bill does provide some requirements. It calls for the filing of documents pursuant to certain clauses.
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee With respect to incorporation?
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee With respect to incorporation, in other words the establishing of the company, this bill does not specify any rules. However, there are other measures within the banking system. The system provides other checks and balances, but under the current legislation, to incorporate the c
March 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the committee. Thank you for inviting me to appear before you to clarify some points with respect to Bill C-4, An Act respecting not-for-profit corporations and certain other corporations, and to answer any questions you may have. It's a plea
March 31st, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee We received their suggestions for changes and we're looking at them. At this point we don't have a position on any one of them in terms of whether we would agree or not. We could undertake to get back to the committee if the committee so wishes.
March 31st, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee I think some of the proposals that have been submitted go to maybe simplifying the drafting. It doesn't really change the nature of the provision or what the provision was intended to do. To the extent that it would create greater clarity, it becomes interesting in terms of possi
March 31st, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee We can get back to the committee on that if it would be useful. I can't answer at this point in time.
March 31st, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee As we indicated, I believe that it is premature to answer today. We read them and are continuing to study them. I intend to return to some of the Canadian Bar Association's proposals, particularly the elimination of parts 6 and 7, but we could also do so for all their recommendat
March 31st, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee I do not know the 50 proposals off the top of my head, but we will get back to you as quickly as possible.
March 31st, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland
Industry committee I have noted that you will begin studying the bill on Thursday. We will get back to you as quickly as possible. We will try.
March 31st, 2009Committee meeting
Roger Charland