Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 30
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  Thank you. Good afternoon. Thank you for the opportunity to address this committee today. My name is Susan Margles and I am vice-president of government relations and policy at Canada Post. It is my job and the job of my team to ensure that parliamentarians are fully informed about Canada Post and that we maintain a productive relationship.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  It was $7.3 billion in 2009.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  Our estimates are between $40 and $80 million, so it is around that number, yes.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  No, actually, Mr. McCallum. The way we estimated the $40 to $80 million I just referred to was to look at what we thought would be open to a threat from these competitors if the bill as it's presented today were to pass. That's our total estimate of what we believe...and we don't have a lot of information about the other businesses in this market because it is a competitive market, so you can understand that people keep these things fairly close.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  No, it's not.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  Yes, that's our estimate. Let me just give a bit of precision around that, Mr. McCallum. What I tried to say in my opening remarks is that we acknowledge that it is a small amount and that we do not believe it will affect our ability to deliver on our universal service obligations.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  Oh, oh!

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  No, I wouldn't say that. We're going to do a lot of things. We are already halfway through the postal transformation process. We're changing the way we process and deliver mail. We want to have the capacity to modify our cost framework to make it more flexible when there are changes on the revenue side.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  Definitely.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  No, because we can go after other revenue in other market sectors. Perhaps we can increase the number of our clients in the parcel or direct marketing sectors.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  In terms of size or just in terms of the permission?

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  No, you're correct. My understanding is that the United States and many of the European countries, in crafting the exclusive privilege for their postal administrations, have already had--or have had all along--this part of the market open.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  Yes. I haven't looked at the numbers per se, but my understanding is that yes, most of the countries in Europe and the U.S., as I say, have had this market open for quite a number of years.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  We have some part of this market right now. We have some customers who print and give it to us to deliver to other countries. It's not just the remailers who are in the business; we are also in this business. It is that part of the business I'm referring to. The truth is this has been in court and disputed for a number of years.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles

Finance committee  I've estimated—and I referred to this earlier—that an amount of $40 million to $80 million was at stake.

May 12th, 2010Committee meeting

Susan Margles