Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 523
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  I'd like to add something, if I may. There are two issues. One is the royal recommendation, per se. We looked at it as a team, and we felt it would require royal recommendation. The other problem is that it's an “S” bill, coming from the Senate. The Senate cannot spend any pub

December 10th, 2012Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  The Law Clerk's office can probably do that if you forward a request. It has to be very minor.

February 12th, 2013Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Procedure and House Affairs committee  That Bill C-23 be amended in clause 48 by adding after section 143.3(b) the following: “3.1 No one may be prosecuted for any offence under this Act on the sole basis of not having complied with section 143.3 (b)(ii).”

April 30th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Natural Resources committee  I'll provide some information, if I may. What you're stating is exactly right in the case of a regular bill. If it were clause 2, let's say, of a regular bill amending an act, then that would be the case. Here, however, clause 120 of this bill is a new act. It's considered a

June 10th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Natural Resources committee  That's correct.

June 10th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Natural Resources committee  I could read the two versions from Ms. Block and Mr. Regan.

June 10th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Natural Resources committee  I'm going to remove the first part as well, the “When”. It would read, “71.(1) When a call for public funds is made under subsection 72(1), those funds are to be used to compensate...if the damage that is suffered (a) occurs in the territory...”, and and then (b), (c), (d). The

June 10th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  You aim at adding a new definition. It's called “prescribed health care institution”. In order to do that the term or the expression has to be in the bill somewhere.

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  If you define a term, the term has to be somewhere in the bill, otherwise it doesn't relate to anything. The definitions, generally speaking, are to help understand the wording in the bill.

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  Okay, that's fine. Would you be able to tell me where it is in the bill, because...?

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  Yes, that's fine.

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  If you know ahead of time that you may have a subamendment, it would be a good thing to move it at the same time you move your amendment, all at once, and then—

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  But when you move your amendment, let's say NDP-2, and you know you want to add “the seller or”, you can move it at that time. When you say, “I want to move my NDP amendment, but I want to change the wording”, you can move it at that point, and we'll consider it a package, if you

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  There is really no such thing as a friendly amendment.

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Health committee  It's a fiction, but that's the way it goes. You propose something that's really an amendment. If it's a friendly amendment, everybody would be agreed.

June 12th, 2014Committee meeting

Philippe Méla