Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Information & Ethics committee Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the committee. Good afternoon. My name is Tamir Israel, and I'm staff lawyer with the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. CIPPIC is very grateful for this opportunity to provide our input into this important
June 3rd, 2014Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Industry committee Thank you, Mr. Chair, and committee members. My name is Tamir Israel, and I'm a staff lawyer with CIPPIC, the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, at the University of Ottawa. CIPPIC works to advance the public interest in policy debates that ar
February 19th, 2015Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Industry committee Sorry, I agree that there should be two thresholds, but the second threshold should be an OPC reporting threshold. What I was trying to say was that, as my colleague mentioned, businesses have a clear understanding of what the two thresholds are for. One is for tracking the types
February 19th, 2015Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Industry committee We would like to see it go through with some minor amendments.
February 19th, 2015Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Industry committee Ideally, proposed paragraph 7(3)(c.1), which was at issue in Spencer, was one of the more controversial paragraphs that were dealt with in the consultation that led to this bill. Our position then, as it is now, is that it should be struck. We think that Spencer understates that.
February 19th, 2015Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Industry committee The addition of compliance agreements is helpful, but it addresses a very specific scenario. What happens with a privacy complaint is that it goes to the commissioner, she does her report, and she issues a recommendation. It's a non-binding recommendation, so let's say the compan
February 19th, 2015Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee Mr. Chair and members of the committee, good morning. My name is Tamir Israel, and I am staff lawyer with CIPPIC, the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic at the University of Ottawa's Centre for Law, Technology and Society and the Faculty of Law.
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee Thanks. I would point to the Privacy Act's counterpart, PIPEDA, which wasn't introduced quite so long ago but adopted a very principled framework as opposed to a more prescriptive one. Some of our recommendations try to accomplish this, as well as some of the recommendations of
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee Without my prejudging the outcome of that decision, what's at issue there is whether, through very contractual clauses, an entity like Facebook that has millions of customers in Canada could essentially opt out of Canadian law. If the decision is that this is the case, I think we
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee I think so. We saw in one instance where a B.C. committee reviewing a counterpart to this law in B.C. had not been aware of a trade commitment that was made, even though some level of the B.C. government was involved in the negotiations of trade agreements. They're so multilatera
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee One of our specific recommendations is to adopt an overarching proportionality mechanism. As we've envisioned that and as it operates in PIPEDA, the private sector counterpart, it would actually sit on top of those exceptions. It doesn't mean that any exception could be overridde
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee In terms of adopting, I think it would be useful to clarify this. Metadata already falls outside the definition of personal information in the act where there are ambiguities. An IP address is a good example. Often the argument will be that because an IP address takes three or fo
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee It's a bit of a tough one, but yes, as a starting point, we would, and probably further than what's in PIPEDA right now. The current damages mechanism in PIPEDA is closer to a fine, basically. It's hard to actually implement, because you need to meet very high standards of proof
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel
Information & Ethics committee That mechanism is tied to damage recovery. I would make it little bit different, because the one in PIPEDA is ancillary to a complaint. You have to file a complaint, go through the process, and basically start all over again in Federal Court if you hope to get damages. Very few p
September 20th, 2016Committee meeting
Tamir Israel