Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Subcommittee on a Code of Conduct for Members committee I think one of your greatest challenges in the dealings of the subcommittee is that you're dealing with definitions that were meant and designed for a relationship between an employer and its employees. It is difficult. I think you hit it right on the nail that there's an absence
February 2nd, 2015Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Subcommittee on a Code of Conduct for Members committee We struggled with that very question when we did the harassment policy for members as employers. The compromise that we came up with is that the complainant can go to the member as an employer, the whip, or the chief human resources officer. It is the choice of the complainant.
February 2nd, 2015Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Subcommittee on a Code of Conduct for Members committee It's because the responsibility rests on the employer to provide a workplace that is free of harassment, so if there's employee-to-employee harassment, it's filed with the employer. It's the responsibility of the employer to investigate and then to take any action that the employ
February 2nd, 2015Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Subcommittee on a Code of Conduct for Members committee It all depends on the level of authority. Again, we've had these debates in the drafting of the other policy. I think the whips are key to a certain extent, because they're already responsible for the discipline within their party. It does raise the question of what to do when it
February 2nd, 2015Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Subcommittee on a Code of Conduct for Members committee Yes. Probably step one would be to define what you are trying to fix. For instance, if you exclude open parliamentary debate and private life to a certain extent, there is a zone in the middle that needs to be defined. Once you know what remains and what you are trying to fix wit
February 2nd, 2015Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Subcommittee on a Code of Conduct for Members committee In any organization, when we face situations like this that involve human resources and are complex, it is always good to get advice, since we do not face these situations on a regular basis. So I think it is appropriate to do so. This was included in the other policy regarding
February 2nd, 2015Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Procedure and House Affairs committee No, thank you.
April 14th, 2016Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Procedure and House Affairs committee Thank you, Marc. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I think it's important to add that the day care doesn't operate under the management of the House of Commons. It operates by its own board of directors and own management. We've had in the past, I would say, 18 months several discussions o
April 14th, 2016Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Procedure and House Affairs committee Parental leave would probably require—and I don't want to speak on behalf of the Law Clerk—modifications to the Parliament of Canada Act where attendance is regulated by section 57. The attendance regulations include illness as a reason for being absent during a sitting day, but
April 14th, 2016Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Procedure and House Affairs committee I would agree with Marc, because the bulk of our staff are full-time permanent employees. We do have a very small portion of our staff who are sessional, who are tied to the actual activities of the House. The same applies to summer. There are some activities that continue in th
April 14th, 2016Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Official Languages committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. It is a rare privilege for a member of the administration to be invited to a committee meeting of this kind. Hello. As chief human resources officer for the House of Commons, I am responsible for the language training centre. The centre's mandate is to im
March 21st, 2017Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Official Languages committee Yes, thank you.
March 21st, 2017Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Official Languages committee We don't maintain that information because it's not necessarily a requirement. Basically, there's no requirement to become an MP, as you are aware, so there's no testing. We have that information for our employees because our employees do require linguistic profiles. We don't mai
March 21st, 2017Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Official Languages committee The House of Commons staff is pretty high, I would say it's above 95%. We serve a population that requires services in both languages, so it makes sense for us to provide that service in both official languages.
March 21st, 2017Committee meeting
Pierre Parent
Official Languages committee We know that in each Parliament the number of students goes up because there's a renewed interest in our services. I don't know if Nina has more information.
March 21st, 2017Committee meeting
Pierre Parent