Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 24
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  That's one, yes. There's that one and there's another one that they link to in it. Yes, I read it.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  I see the statistics, but I have to confess that I've been involved in enough human rights cases at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal that I often doubt how those statistics are created. I have to confess in all fairness that when I read that report, “Results and Respect in the RCMP Workplace”, I'll say frankly, I didn't believe it.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  On the surface of it—

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  Completely and utterly.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  I'm done with a case just this last fall, six months ago. It's grotesque. This is the Police College one. It's ridiculous, but I've seen it before. Nothing surprises me anymore.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  Well, I guess if they were harassed because they were trying to unionize or because they were a representative who was assisting another member and then they became subjected to some unfair treatment, you're right, that could be something you could bootstrap under an unfair labour practice complaint and get before the board.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  Yes, very potentially. That wasn't before the MPAO case, but there are other cases before the Supreme Court of Canada such as the B.C. Health Services case. It had to do with certain workplace conditions that the employer unilaterally imposed by statute of the B.C. government, and then the union was deprived of the opportunity to negotiate.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  Probably the thrust of some of these exclusions, like the transfers ones, is that the RCMP wants to reserve unto itself that they're still a paramilitary organization. If we tell you you're going to the front lines, or you're going to this remote community, that's where you're going.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ

Public Safety committee  I can answer that in a couple of seconds. At the end of the day, even removing the exclusions doesn't mean their subject matter is necessarily going to be subject to the collective agreement. It will still be subject to collective bargaining. If the RCMP as the employer, or the Treasury Board—whoever does the bargaining—insists that they need absolute control over postings and when they happen, they can say, “We're not putting that on the table, guys.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Champ