Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 50
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  Thank you, Mr. President. Good afternoon. Tena koutou katoa. Greetings from New Zealand. Hello to Tom. I propose to speak to some of the slides in the New Zealand Electoral Commission's presentation, specifically slide 5, which deals with the electoral reform process that s

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  Please, then, turn to slide 5, which deals with the electoral reform process that saw New Zealand adopt the MMP electoral system in 1993. The process began with growing public dissatisfaction in the 1970s and early 1980s with the perceived fairness of our first-past-the-post sys

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  That is correct. In fact, 70% of candidates are dual candidates, standing in an electorate and also on a party list.

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  That's right. In the background material, we provided a description of the process we use for allocating the party seats and electorate seats. It follows the Sainte-Laguë formula. Essentially we determine the total number of seats a party is entitled to in the Parliament on the

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  That is correct. We describe MMP as a moderate form of proportional representation. It's unlike such systems as the Israeli system. We have quite high thresholds for parties to pass before they become eligible for allocation of the seats. You have to win at least one electorate s

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  One of the benefits that was advanced for MMP by the royal commission was that it was likely to result in a more representative parliament, because of the feature of the party list, and for whatever reason, it seems to be the case that it's more difficult for candidates who are w

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  It was introduced first in 1995 in the first MMP election. One of the things about MMP is that it recognizes as a system the importance of parties, so Parliament's intention was to make the ballot paper easier for voters to use by identifying more recognizably the party and also

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  Formally, no: a parliamentarian elected from the list has exactly the same entitlements and responsibilities as a member elected from an electorate.

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  Thank you, Mr. Rogers. I am able to speak with authority on the New Zealand context and tradition. I'm not at all in a position to comment on what might be appropriate for Canada. That is very much something for the Canadian Parliament and people. In the New Zealand context an

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  There have been separate Maori seats since 1867 in New Zealand. People who identify themselves as being of Maori descent are eligible to enrol either on the general roll or on the Maori roll. Depending upon the exercise of that choice, when it comes to defining the boundaries, we

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  List MPs often attach themselves to particular areas or particular constituencies, but in terms of public perceptions, I think it's fair to say that there is evidence that the New Zealand public regards electorate MPs, the people they can go to, as having a higher status than lis

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  We have very comprehensive data on that because we report on the level of informal votes. Somebody can cast a party vote and not mark a candidate, so that's a valid party vote and an informal candidate vote. They can also—although this happens less—mark their candidate vote but

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  In relation to the decisions made in 1992 and 1993, they were in the context of ongoing debate that had been under way since the mid-eighties. This was an issue of much public discussion.

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  There have been very high-profile politicians who were list only—for example, the current Deputy Prime Minister is list only, and a previous Deputy Prime Minister and Attorney General was a list MP—so I don't think so. Often if a member of Parliament has aspirations of being a Sp

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden

Electoral Reform committee  Not quite. The referendum in 1992 was a two-part question. The first question that was posed in 1992 was whether they wanted to retain the current system of first past the post or change it. The second part of that 1992 referendum asked them to indicate which of four options th

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Peden