Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 23
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  That's absolutely right.

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  This was a political decision. It was entirely the decision of the Parliament. It was based on the intention that the new parliament would be proportional but without going as far as 50/50. When they set up the Welsh Assembly, they went for a slightly different percentage betwee

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  We did, and we had a referendum to determine whether there would be a parliament in 1997, so it was a very hectic period of time. It was a time of a very fast-moving process of devolution. Yes, we did have the legislation in 1998, and we then had to run the election in May 1999.

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  No, absolutely not. As I say, it was an issue. It was actually quite helpful that that surfaced quite quickly and we were able to be very explicit about it. But it required the major parties to make those statements and to make it absolutely clear that they regarded their MSPs, r

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  On the first point, in relation to voter understanding, I wouldn't suggest that everybody has a deep understanding of how the D’Hondt method works or the weighted inclusive Gregory method works, but people have a level of trust in it because we've explained it to those who want t

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  For example, we had over 90% voting in our independence referendum. In a local government election, the turnout might well be closer to 50%. It's much more a function of how voters view the specific importance of the election rather than what the system is, though. Voters will vo

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  It was actually very straightforward and it worked very well.

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  I suppose it would be helpful perhaps to refer you to the referendum that we had in the U.K. in 2011, which was exactly about moving to a different form of voting for the U.K. Westminster Parliament. We called it the AV referendum. We were going to move to an additional vote syst

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  Yes, regarding the referendum on independence, people had very, very strong views on it. But actually, in terms of running it as a process, it was really quite straightforward. A lot of what we did was focused on ensuring voters understood how to cast their votes, understood that

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  There was back in 2007. We did have a very difficult election then, because we were trying to run two very different systems on the same day, with a single ballot paper for the two types of MSPs, and a separate ballot paper for the council elections. With hindsight, that was far

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  Most of the time voters aren't really given a choice about the electoral system; it will be a decision that the politicians take for them. The only time we've given voters a choice was in 2011, when there was a U.K.-wide referendum on moving to the additional vote system. From

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  I think voters are more sophisticated than we give them credit for. In my experience, particularly if you're setting up a new institution like the Scottish Parliament, voters are very open to considering a different system from the normal first past the post one. The Scottish Par

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  I'm sure they did. Certainly the very statistics you just quoted have been used in the media here to highlight the potential benefits of having more proportional systems for Westminster. Last year was unique, I think. But it does show that in a straightforward first past the post

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  The only thing I was going to add was that our schools have recently taken a role in making sure that young people, who now have the vote in Scotland at age 16 and 17, meaning students in schools, colleges, universities, have a clear understanding of the importance of registering

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly

Electoral Reform committee  I would say that over the last two or three years schools have taken on much more of a role in this area. Particularly, we've engaged with the directors of education for each of the local authorities, with School Leaders Scotland, who represent head teachers, and with the educa

August 31st, 2016Committee meeting

Mary Pitcaithly