Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 24
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to thank the committee for this invitation. My remarks will be in English, but I will be pleased to answer questions in French. Again, thanks for the opportunity to be heard by video conference. I think the technology is wonderful, and I

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  I don't know about pitfalls, but the challenge, of course, is our wonderful federal structure, our Constitution, which provides exclusive jurisdiction to the provinces to do what they want with their companies acts. The federal government doesn't have the authority to force the p

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  It's difficult to get very hard data on exactly how much dirty money is being funnelled through Canadian anonymous corporations. Most of the evidence is indirect, but if you look at our report, there are a lot of indications that a lot of money is being laundered through Canada t

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  I will say something very quick about that, and then I'm going to ask Monsieur Meunier to chime in as well. To put it very simply, if you are an RCMP investigator trying to understand who is behind a company or a transaction because you have some evidence that indicates that a n

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  Yes. We believe that the name of the shareholders of Canadian companies should be in a public registry. However, there is much discussion about making information available to government authorities but not to the public.

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  We think this information should be public by default. If important reasons, such as privacy, for instance, or other reasons like that were invoked to ensure that the information wasn't disclosed—

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  —then it would have to be demonstrated they are well-founded.

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  First, I think again it's the wrong question.

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  Why not divulge it to the public—

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  What is the interest you're trying to—

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  We're not talking about divulging—

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  We're not talking about—

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  I don't—

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  I think the privacy—

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde

Industry committee  Okay, the privacy element on beneficial ownership on corporate shares, to our mind, is a red herring. We're not asking people to divulge how much they make or how much things are worth or what their net value is. It's very basic tombstone information. People who own 25% or more—t

February 9th, 2017Committee meeting

Paul Lalonde