Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 32
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'd have to look it up, but I don't think proof is required. Michel, do you know the answer?

September 25th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. We're very happy to be here today, and we're always responsive to your request to appear before this committee. I will say, however, that not having expected to be here for clause-by-clause, we have not had a chance to review all of these amendments. We're

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It could not be, currently.

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  No. What was just described is absolutely correct. The statement of the vote provides the reconciliation currently and it will continue to do that under any new system. Even if we're having several polling divisions at the polling station, the statement of the vote is what provid

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The statement of the vote is in the bill, in regard to section 287.

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'm not sure how to answer that question exactly. We're talking about the future, so we don't have forms developed at the moment. There's no question that these prescribed forms will be developed to enable what you're describing, which Trevor described, which is a proper count th

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I myself was trying to remember the number, and unfortunately I don't have the adaptation in front of me, so I can't answer this specific question. I don't think we'd take any position on the policy around this issue.

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'm just nodding in agreement. That's correct.

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I'm sorry. We don't have anything to offer on that in response to that question.

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Yes, I can confirm that, and I can also indicate that when we did the recommendations report with the previous chief electoral officer we consulted with the CRTC and presented on their behalf certain recommendations respecting these portions of the act. However, they certainly ha

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  My understanding currently of the Bill C-76 provision that we're looking at is that it requires the count of votes to take place in the presence of candidates and their representatives or, if none of them are present, in the presence of at least two electors. In our understandi

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  No, I'm not going to tell you whether I'm in favour of it or not. It's something we could administer, so we don't object to it.

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Just to be clear, my only views are about the administration of the act, not about my personal preference in favour of an amendment or not.

October 16th, 2018Committee meeting

Anne Lawson