Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 18
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  I would start by saying that with the $631 application fee as it currently exists for record suspensions, there are service standards in place, so it would be, say, six months for a summary conviction and 12 months for an indictment. With the proposal being discussed here with B

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  Broadly speaking, I am reluctant to give a particular amount of time. Again, I think we would have to assess the volumes we have. There are thousands of applications that come in each year, but certainly it would fall well below the accepted service standards that are put in plac

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  No, that's definitely the case. If we were looking at pardons that would not continue to be in place, it would either be a situation involving good conduct, but most often, it would be a new conviction.

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  I'm not sure I follow the question.

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  If an applicant submits the required documents that demonstrate that they've satisfied—

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  We would then issue the record suspension and we would contact the RCMP, and then the RCMP would remove it from the CPIC record. My colleague could confirm—

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  As the minister alluded to earlier, if it were possible to do that, that would be fantastic. I think the issue we're faced with is not having a particular offence that's simple possession of cannabis. For example, we need to have the CPIC record, which is verified by fingerprints

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  As part of the Parole Board's communication and outreach strategy associated with the expedited pardon approach proposed under Bill C-93, yes, there would be Internet resources available. However, as you point out, it might be somewhat difficult to get those in some cases. They w

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  Absolutely. That's definitely part of our overall strategy: leveraging social media.

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  I might turn the answer to this question over to my colleague Brigitte.

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  No. The no-fee is the application fee that is collected by the Parole Board of Canada.

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  I think the costs vary quite a bit, depending on which police service or which court. I don't have any hard and fast estimates with me to provide right now. I do believe that the department maybe had a cursory examination on this issue. But again, you'd be talking.... I would hes

April 29th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  Sure, I can weigh in. Thank you very much. Under this amendment, from the Parole Board of Canada's perspective, we don't currently have the technological capacity to implement what is outlined in this motion. We'd need to consult with partners. We would want to verify some of th

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom

Public Safety committee  Currently, we do not.

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ian Broom