Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 23
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. It should be fine to go now.

June 15th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Health committee  Mr. Chair, if the committee sees fit to allow me to clean up the grammar, then I would be certainly willing to do that.

June 15th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  From my understanding, this is a vote on the amendment by Mr. Fisher.

June 15th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. I will go right to it. (Motion as amended agreed to: yeas 10; nays 1 [See Minutes of Proceedings])

June 15th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Mr. Chair, we should be—

June 17th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Health committee  We should be good to go, Mr. Chair.

June 17th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. The vote is on the amendment. If you are in favour, say yea. If you are opposed, say nay. (Amendment agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4)

July 7th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. This is my understanding of the subamendment. We would delete the words after “provided that the” and replace them with “Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel vet the documents for matters of cabinet confidence and national security as well as p

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

Health committee  Do you mean “as well as privacy”?

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Okay, so what I have, in its entirety, is “provided that the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel vet the documents for matters of cabinet confidence and national security as well as privacy pertaining to names and personal information.”

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. My understanding of this subamendment would be that it narrows the scope of what Ms. Sidhu was asking for, and it clarifies or modifies the proposed amendment. So, in this case, my understanding of this subamendment would be that the documents would arrive

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Mr. Chair, I'm not sure about that. I wouldn't think so.

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Mr. Chair, I don't have a definitive response for what the law clerk's security clearance is. I would imagine that it's quite high.

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  You're currently debating the amendment, which reads, “provided that the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel vet the documents for matters of cabinet confidence and national security as well as privacy pertaining to names and personal information.”

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. It is to change the first date to August 31 and the second, so that the dates Monday, August 3, 2020, and Monday, August 10, 2020, be replaced by the dates Monday, August 31, 2020, and Monday, September 7, 2020, respectively. Also, a quick note that Sept

July 13th, 2020Committee meeting

The Clerk