Health committee  Mr. Chair, it would appear that we have 11 yeas.

Health committee  Mr. Chair, may I please reread the original motion as I understand it, just to be clear that I'm capturing everything completely?

Health committee  Thank you. I do have the dates in two different places in the motion. Here it is: That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(1)(a), the committee send for the following documents to be provided by the government by Monday, August 31, 2020 and that the documents be published publicly

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. The amendment is that the words “Minister of Health's office” be removed from the motion.

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. It reads: That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(1)(a), the committee send for the following documents to be provided by the government by Monday, August 31, 2020 and that the documents be published publicly on the committee’s website by Monday, September 7,

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. If I follow this correctly, what Mr. Van Bynen is proposing is that the words “the Prime Ministers Office” be considered as a separate amendment. That would be your subamendment. In this case, you're further clarifying this. So, if you voted in favour that

Health committee  Mr. Chair, the subamendment is that the words “Prime Minister's office” be removed from the amendment.

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. It is to change the first date to August 31 and the second, so that the dates Monday, August 3, 2020, and Monday, August 10, 2020, be replaced by the dates Monday, August 31, 2020, and Monday, September 7, 2020, respectively. Also, a quick note that Sept

Health committee  Mr. Chair, the motion does not specify that. Someone would have to make that amendment.

Health committee  You're currently debating the amendment, which reads, “provided that the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel vet the documents for matters of cabinet confidence and national security as well as privacy pertaining to names and personal information.”

Health committee  Mr. Chair, I don't have a definitive response for what the law clerk's security clearance is. I would imagine that it's quite high.

Health committee  Mr. Chair, I'm not sure about that. I wouldn't think so.

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. My understanding of this subamendment would be that it narrows the scope of what Ms. Sidhu was asking for, and it clarifies or modifies the proposed amendment. So, in this case, my understanding of this subamendment would be that the documents would arrive

Health committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. This is my understanding of the subamendment. We would delete the words after “provided that the” and replace them with “Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel vet the documents for matters of cabinet confidence and national security as well as p

Health committee  Do you mean “as well as privacy”?