Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 53
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  PV-1 indicates “which includes”, so it's not limited to the list that follows. It includes the list plus whatever needs to be added to the list. The same goes for LIB-2, which indicates “assault law and social context, which includes systemic racism and systemic discrimination”

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  I won't comment on the impact; that would be more of a legal question that the department may weigh in on. In terms of procedural admissibility, they're fine.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Mr. Fortin has an amendment just before amendment PV-3.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Yes, indeed, you are right.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  I can answer this question, Madam Chair. In the French version, there is no need to have a change to replace the second “should”, because it's already included in the first one. In French it says, “dans lequel il précise”. It's the report that we're talking about, the one that

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. To understand exactly how paragraph 2 would read after the amendments, I'm going to read it to make sure I understand it properly. It would be for proposed subsection 62.1(2), “Tabling of report”: The Minister shall cause a copy of any report received

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Thank you, Mr. Fortin.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Mr. Moore, can you hear me?

November 17th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Thank you. This is the legislative clerk here, Philippe Méla. Yes, you're right. There is a deadline that was set, and thank you for sending your amendments on time. That allows us to look at them procedurally and also to prepare the package of amendments and prepare the agenda

November 17th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  I'm not sure what the question is exactly, Mr. Maloney.

November 17th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Yes, I provided the advice to the chair that the amendment be ruled inadmissible. After that it's up to the chair to decide if it is really inadmissible or not, and then the ruling is issued. After that, once the ruling is issued, the proper course of action, if any, would be to

November 17th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. The bill amends section 241.2, which is a different section of the Criminal Code from section 241, and sections 241.2 and 241.31, and that's it. Those sections of the Criminal Code are different from section 241.

November 17th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Yes, you would be right in saying that, when a section is opened, you can deal with any part of the section. Unfortunately, section 241 is not opened by the bill. There are other sections. Section 31 is a different section of the Criminal Code. It's not a subsection of section 24

November 17th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. Yes, you would be right, Mr. Moore. It's always the prerogative of the committee to decide what the committee wants to achieve and do, regardless of the rules. However, any amendments that are ruled inadmissible in committee would end up in the report tha

November 17th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla