Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 151-165 of 258
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canadian Heritage committee  The 900,000 households are located in areas where conversion will take place. These are households that do not subscribe to cable or satellite services. As you know, if someone subscribes to cable or satellite, they have nothing to worry about; nothing will change for them. The 9

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  We have found a solution to the problem. As we stated in our conversation with Mr. Del Mastro, Shaw has proposed, as part of the transaction in which it acquired Canwest Television, to set aside $15 million for providing satellite service to all 31,500 households and not only to

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  The important message here is not to start too early, because after all, the main thing here is that this will not affect 93% of Canadians. That is clear.

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  Just to make it clear, spectrum in Canada is primarily regulated by the Department of Industry. Those are the people who slice and dice the spectrum, provide for its uses, and auction off what can be auctioned off for mobile uses. We at the CRTC only handle the broadcasting assig

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  That's not for us at the CRTC to explain. We have learned from the U.S. experience that direct subsidy mechanisms are not necessary.

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  That's what we're about to embark upon. That's the last phase of what we've been working on with industry.

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  As I indicated earlier in the questioning, we have been able to work within the confines of the current policy to come up with a mechanism that minimizes the impact of loss of service to Canadians, and we've found a way to ensure that those who will lose service will be provided

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  In the U.S. at the time, the boxes were valued at about $75, and I believe they provided coupons to households for about $40, which brought the cost to them down to about $35. Here in Canada, being a couple of years behind and having learned from that experience, manufacturing,

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  Industry Canada has the folks who are the specialists in that domain. We only deal with repurposing the broadcasting spectrum and reassigning it to the various broadcasters pursuant to their licences.

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  We estimated the number of households that will no longer receive service at 31,500. This estimate was established a while ago. Today, we have the figures on hand, and reports from various broadcasters are coming in constantly. As I said earlier, in rural areas, broadcasters can

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  I think the commission has moved away from the third one. Having moved from being a few years behind the United States and boxes as low as $30, we think the latter one is no longer necessary. What is key right now for us is coordinating. That's what we're working on with the De

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  That's what we're looking at.

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  Essentially, in the mandatory markets, those for whom the television stations will be converting, we're looking at around the 900,000 number. So in their case, there are various options, but the boxes, thanks to us being a couple of years behind the U.S., manufacturing being what

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes. That's more or less where we are, but that is a very high number because we're being on the safe side in estimating both, those who will need to purchase equipment or potentially lose service.

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton

Canadian Heritage committee  Certainly. First of all, compared to the U.S., we are slightly further ahead on cable and satellite penetration, so there is an advantage there. We mentioned that the U.S. converted two years back. That extra time, being a fast follower in this case, has allowed greater penetra

February 28th, 2011Committee meeting

Scott Hutton