Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 44
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  Basically, the issue is that Bill C-19 doesn't amend section 117 of the Firearms Act. We can't go in to amend that if the bill doesn't do it at second reading.

November 29th, 2011Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Justice committee  We would need an amendment in writing for what you're proposing.

June 21st, 2011Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Public Safety committee  Basically, what we started with was just “whether the”. What we're going to be doing with the subamendment is that instead of just replacing line one, we're actually going to be replacing lines one and two. It will read: “whether the offender's return to Canada while they are ser

February 3rd, 2011Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Public Safety committee  No, it's “return” now.

February 3rd, 2011Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

February 3rd, 2011Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  Right now, the bill as amended by the committee leaves schedule 1 of the Patent Act intact, and the schedule that was found in Bill C-393 now becomes schedule 2. There are two schedules. The first schedule, schedule 1, was the list of pharmaceutical products or drugs or--

November 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  Exactly. The new schedule 2 is a list of countries. That basically consolidates the three other schedules that listed countries. Now we just have one list of countries and that would be schedule 2.

November 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  It's my understanding that the three country lists have been--

November 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  Liberal-5 from the past meeting had the effect of leaving in the original schedule 1 of the Patent Act, and the schedule in Bill C-393 would then become schedule 2. So most of the amendments--1.3 to 1.6--just correct references to schedule 2. I believe that Liberal-1.2 reinstates

November 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  Yes. In the new package that was distributed, it is indicated at the bottom of each amendment. If there's nothing indicated at the bottom of the amendment, it hasn't been debated or had any decision on it. Lib-1 was withdrawn. Today we're resuming debate on Lib-2. As Mr. Garne

November 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  I'm just saying that you run the risk.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  Any motion to amend the bill submitted at report stage runs the risk of not being selected. The basic rule is that if it could have been done at committee, it should have been done at committee, so you run the risk of having the Speaker not select your motions for debate.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  Could you repeat that please?

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  I don't know that it is.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson

Industry committee  Yes it is, because there is still a reference to Schedule 1. Whether it's the new or the old document, it's still Schedule 1. However, you will be losing the reference to the Minister of Health.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Mike MacPherson