Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-18 of 18
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Health committee  I'd again like to endorse the idea that this consent should be as specific as possible. I agree with Professor Baylis on that point. But the question is on whether or not section 8 is the appropriate place to talk about the substance of consent. I would like to read from the stu

December 12th, 2006Committee meeting

Timothy Caulfield

Health committee  That is obviously an excellent question. I actually have the study before me and would be happy to leave it with the committee. It's a valuable study, done by Jeff Nisker and his colleagues. I do want to clarify what it was: 45% was a non-response. So we don't know what they woul

December 12th, 2006Committee meeting

Timothy Caulfield

Health committee  Thank you very much for this invitation to come and speak today. This is a topic I have great interest in and have had the opportunity to examine for some time. Also, it's nice to see that we're to the regulation stage. My comments are brief. In general, I support the regulation

December 12th, 2006Committee meeting

Timothy Caulfield