Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 110
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  So I think that gives a perspective.

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Industry committee  Basically, I've looked at the market as a whole: all of the bank debt, all of the bond debt, the pension deficit, and then the equity in the economy. I think I've sorted out in my mind that for the economy as a whole, as long as the recovery is 40% in the bankruptcy, then the sec

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Industry committee  Yes, I was a financial expert in the asset-backed commercial paper bankruptcy, which was the largest bankruptcy in Canada. It involved $220 billion of credit default swaps. I have updated my analysis and have determined that there are $4.5 trillion of credit default swaps on the

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Industry committee  First of all, the impact is negative 1.5%, not what you just said. I said 20 basis points, so that's 0.20%. So if the mid-term bond now is at 3.25% interest rate, I'm saying that's going to go to 3.45% interest rate, so that's a difference of 0.20%. When the interest rate goes u

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Industry committee  I'm going to speak technically this morning on the impact of Bill C-501 on the cost of credit. My conclusion is that the cost-of-credit impact is small on investment-grade owners and corporations with defined benefit pension plans. By comparison, the impact is small relative to

November 16th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  I just want to make the comment that we're very concerned about the Nortel Canada estate. Nortel's bankruptcy process is being driven out of New York, by the unsecured creditors committee. It's entirely possible that the Canadian estate will not have significant funds in it. My e

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  Sure, in fact work in the public.... It's been broadly circulated with invitations to anyone who would like to make suggestions as to where I may not have it right. So far, no one has produced any contrary studies, but you're more than welcome to send it anywhere in the world.

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  They were not forthright with respect to two matters. They did not adequately advise the employees of Nortel that when they made their own employee contributions to raise the amount paid, or when the employer made his own contributions, those contributions of money were not goi

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  We'd like to see the BIA amended, because it's going to deal with all circumstances, now and forever, whether you have a trust account or a trustee agreement or whether you're simply providing those long-term disability benefits on a self-insured basis. We'd like to take this fir

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  I think we also have to consider that his pension, which was 90%, was 60%. People don't retire at their working wage. They get 60% of their working wage. Then he takes 90% of 60%, so now he has 54%. Then she takes 60% of 54%, so—who can do the math here?—that is 35%, and then tak

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  I would rather that you spend your time on providing preferred status for the pensioners and the terminated workers and that you give a preferred plus, or super-priority, for the long-term disabled. In that manner we can be assured that when there is money in the corporations the

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  I agree with you.

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  There's a substantial—

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  The problem has arisen because there is a substantial number of corporations that self-insure their long-term disability benefits. That means they are acting in the role of an insurance company.

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart

Finance committee  What happened in the Nortel case was that it was misrepresented. Up until 2005 there were no disclosures that would lead anyone to believe they had a long-term benefit that was not insured by a third party. Remember, this is a non-unionized environment, and post-2005 Nortel indic

March 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Diane Urquhart