Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee I'm sorry, I'm not sure I entirely understand your question. Change things with respect to whom?
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee I listened to the discussion of the reverse onus provisions. My understanding is that the Constitution and the charter are living documents. I have great faith in the Supreme Court of Canada to see the issues before us right now and to revisit the law if necessary.
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee Probably both. There is the specific deterrent aspect, clearly, but we know that the 21-year-olds killing each other with guns on the streets of our cities know what they're facing when they're found with a loaded gun. They know what the law is, and I'm sure if you practise crimi
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee I'll answer that this way. If there aren't people offending and reoffending, why do we need chronic offender units? Why do we need integrated sexual predator units that follow sexual predators who are on warrant expiry or who are under some sort of supervision and are reoffending
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee We're here to support these Criminal Code amendments as one part of a larger initiative against violent crime, so clearly, sir, the public is calling for it.
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee We support constitutionally valid provisions that allow for the continued incarceration of the most serious of offenders. We support that, and we work with the prosecutor service to try to make that a reality. When the Johnson case came out, we were a bit concerned about the impa
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee Neither of us would profess to be experts in this particular area of the criminal law, but I think there's a certain reality. I've heard our colleagues here talk about judicial discretion. We've alluded to what prosecutors may or may not do. This is a theme you're going to hear o
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee You're not going to get an argument from a chief of police or deputy chief of police about liking more resources.
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 2nd Session) committee Good afternoon, Mr. Chair, honourable members. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. Many of you will know that the CACP appears before your committee and before the Senate on a wide range of bills. In fact, members of our association have appeared before this com
November 14th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Information & Ethics committee Thank you for the opportunity to respond to that. Perhaps I'll try to provide some clarity of our view on that. Our view is that whenever information is of the type that attracts section 8 of the charter protection, the right to privacy protection, or the right to be free from u
February 13th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Information & Ethics committee I've been listening to the line of questions and the answers. If you'll permit me, I'll answer that question in a couple of ways. First of all, I will say that the misinterpretation of PIPEDA and perhaps the ambiguity of the act does on occasion hinder us, yes. Specifically, if
February 13th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Information & Ethics committee Sure. I'll endeavour to do that when I leave here. The second point is we talked a little bit about, and I think the honourable member over here mentioned, cellphone usage. This technology advancement is a real issue for us. The lawful access issues are a number one priority for
February 13th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Information & Ethics committee Thank you. I have a point of clarification on the translation. You referred to a commission. Are you talking about the Arar report?
February 13th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Information & Ethics committee I have a few comments. First of all, I don't suggest you intended to imply this, but I don't believe the commissioner found in that inquiry that any information was manufactured by the RCMP.
February 13th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold
Information & Ethics committee In any event, I will say that a number of mechanisms are in place for us to deal with breaches of our policies, breaches of our laws, and breaches of our internal ethics and standards. Yes, there are abuses on occasion, and we take them very seriously as police leaders and police
February 13th, 2007Committee meeting
Clayton Pecknold