Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee This bill does not establish the account. The account is already established.
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee As for the expenditures that the fund can support, those terms are established under the FAA.
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee That's already stipulated in the FAA.
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee For this fund, yes.
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee It can be used in a proactive or remedial way. In other words, it can be used for conservation purposes, for example, as well as for mediation. But it's strictly for environmental purposes, and it's for non-governmental use. So to address your first question, what's in the fund
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee Mr. Chair, fines have been levied under the Migratory Birds Convention Act and paid into this fund, and we will confirm the amount for this afternoon's meeting.
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee Yes, I think essentially Mr. Godfrey is suggesting that the clause now references clauses that no longer exist, and he's right.
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee Mr. Chairman, would it be possible to confirm the wording, just for those of us trying to keep track?
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee My understanding was that the Liberal amendments to clause 18 created additional regulatory authorities. I'm wondering if this clause should be extended to those new authorities as well.
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee I could give you an example, but I don't think I could do so comprehensively in the....
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee The intention of this amendment, of course, is part and parcel of the government's overall approach. That was to create a separate clean air part, in order to allow for the scientific identification, assessment, monitoring, and regulation, ultimately and if necessary, of air poll
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee I want to remind members, respectfully, that in fact this provision is independent of the creation of a clean air part or not. All this provision is doing is taking these substances off the list of toxic substances. It's doing so in conjunction with other provisions, which have n
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee Mr. Chair, before you do that, the officials aren't here; they will be here for the 3:30 session. This is my responsibility. I told them they probably wouldn't be needed for this time because I had assumed you were going to go back and do the provisions that you had deferred, the
March 28th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee Sure. Mr. McGuinty is correct in the sense that this provision is no longer needed. This doesn't actually establish a new committee. What we were trying to do was ensure that the national advisory committee, which is a federal-provincial-aboriginal committee that advises on all
March 29th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet
Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee We don't need it.
March 29th, 2007Committee meeting
John Moffet