Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-7 of 7
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Accounts committee  There are no appropriations per se to fund the plan. Maybe I could just take two minutes to say that.... It's a little complicated. Prior to 2000, there were no funds, no particular funds themselves.

February 21st, 2007Committee meeting

Phil Charko

Public Accounts committee  Post-2000 is when the market investments started.

February 21st, 2007Committee meeting

Phil Charko

Public Accounts committee  Yes, actually, I think you're missing two points. One is that the actual funds themselves, the employer and employee contributions, are now being invested by a corporation, a crown corporation, called the Public Sector Pension Investment Board. This is independent and at arm's le

February 21st, 2007Committee meeting

Phil Charko

Public Accounts committee  That's since April 2000. So since April 2000, the actual funds have been invested professionally by this crown corporation. The organization that is at issue here was responsible for the administration of the plan--the entitlement calculation and those types of administrative as

February 21st, 2007Committee meeting

Phil Charko

Public Accounts committee  As a defined benefit plan, this plan is a statute of the Government of Canada, so the requirement to pay the benefit is based on the law itself, on the act itself.

February 21st, 2007Committee meeting

Phil Charko

Public Accounts committee  I'm not convinced, from what I've heard this afternoon, that the RCMP, as an institution, is looking to override the normal controls of the Financial Administration Act, and so on. In fact, in looking at the corrective action that has been taken since the audit was found, as the

February 21st, 2007Committee meeting

Phil Charko

Public Accounts committee  No. I did not hear that.

February 21st, 2007Committee meeting

Phil Charko