Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  My explanation is quite a simple one, and that is that if we went to the super-critical technology at that time, which was the existing best available technology economically achievable under American definitions, then that would only have a lifetime of eight to ten years before

Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Yes, this is a very important point, I think, for the committee, given the nature of this bill, because what we are trying to suggest with the clean coal technology is a technology that deals not only with carbon dioxide, but with sulphur dioxide, with NOx, and with mercury. We'r

Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Yes. We haven't seen all the details of this yet, but the concept of pan-emissions legislation is very much, from our point of view, to be desired.

Bill C-30 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  The second point is that big opportunities come from new technology. Many of the Canadian electricity industries have been working hard to develop clean combustion technology and have been exploring opportunities for carbon capture and storage. Some of the hurdles are technical