Transport committee  Are you referring to the accidents that have occurred at the level crossing?

Transport committee  No. All of the level crossings are still there. There are three within the area I am talking about, plus one or two unofficial crossing points.

Transport committee  No.

Transport committee  As a municipality, no.

Transport committee  At present, no freight is being picked up at the station. The station now belongs to the city; it no longer belongs to the railway company. The passenger train stops in Montmagny when someone buys a ticket over the Internet or by phone. Otherwise, it does not stop there. You can'

Transport committee  From Montmagny? Very few.

Transport committee  Railway service is not—

Transport committee  If there were a bypass that wasn't—

Transport committee  No, we would like passenger service to develop, but at present, there are very few users because of buses and other services. We could keep the segment and link it to the bypass route. I think I would maintain passenger service.

Transport committee  You're asking a lot of questions that I cannot answer. We would have to consider the costs, the volume, and so on.

Transport committee  No, not at all, because what we are currently concerned about is the 40 km/h speed.

Transport committee  Because of the geography and configuration, I don't think that a bypass in Montmagny would be the most economical solution, because the river widens when you go a little bit further south. In a case like Montmagny, the solution would be a reduction in speed, in addition to a comm

Transport committee  The one we know.

Transport committee  One of my objectives in appearing here today was to find out the committee's position. I think that if we want to get things moving, the rail company needs to feel as though it is under some pressure, that it may lose certain things or certain advantages. In CN's case if we can

Transport committee  Could you repeat the question? I lost a bit at the beginning.