Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Yes, the difference between the two figures is the ones that are not cleared by charge at all, which are not solved, and also the ones that are cleared by police other than by a charge, so say through informal process diversion or some other reason like that. The first cut is that they have to find an accused person.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Well, as there is no Criminal Code offence on drive-by shootings, we don't collect those specifically.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  That's correct.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  That would be an offence that it would be up to the police officer to determine. We would collect that offence. It certainly is a Criminal Code incident. As to what it would fall under, it could be attempted murder, or—

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  It could also be attempted murder.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  It could be a level 3 assault, potentially, too.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Yes, those are certainly some of our serious violent crimes.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Approximately, yes.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Certainly.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  The police statistics don't include those, as we don't have information from the military police.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  I don't have the numbers here, but I'm pretty sure most of them are knives or other cutting-type weapons. We have about four or five different breakdowns. I could get you that if that is important.

Bill C-35 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  We don't have the information here today to tell you that. We just have whether it's a firearm.