Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 91-105 of 138
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  We do intend to keep them because we find that such teams are effective.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  I will let Ms. Proulx answer.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  I wouldn't say statistics don't play a role. As you notice, we do keep track of how many cases we run, and we do keep time, so that we can allocate our resources in a rational way. But when it comes to what the won-lost record is, that is not a factor whatsoever in our thinking.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  I'll start off the answer, and then Mr. Fortin will complete it. It's my understanding that it goes down a bit because some of the money that we receive to do what are called IMETs—integrated market enforcement teams—sunsets. This was an initiative that was for three or four yea

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  Yes, we do. To give you an example, we have a system that's been in place for a few years, where additional funding is given for policing initiatives. You'll see in our report that we refer to some additional moneys related to a federal policing initiative that we have to get b

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  We didn't do it, because we were part of the Department of Justice before.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  Well, we had to make our case with Justice first, is my understanding of the past. If I could just add, there's one area where we do find it difficult, and that is when the provinces decide to increase their resources. If Ontario decides to increase its police resources, or the

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  It goes before supplementary estimates. That's actually where it will have to show up, so you'll have an opportunity at that stage.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  I always thought the agenda of Treasury Board was considered a cabinet confidence. That's why I'm hesitating to agree.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  I can do that.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  That's my understanding.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  No, that's in the same situation. As I say, we're doing this prudently. We were just established a few months ago.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  What I'm saying is that we don't have the breakdown to the penny. We have an idea of what we're going to be spending it on. As I mentioned, the $15 million is to cover moving, to cover IMIT, and things of that nature.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders

Justice committee  No. I just gave you the broad lines of the $15 million. I'll tell you that the $7.8 million is designed to establish a corporate infrastructure within our new organization.

May 17th, 2007Committee meeting

Brian Saunders