Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-3 of 3

Procedure and House Affairs committee  At first glance, I think that could be the case, but I cannot say so with certitude. We would have to study the question. It could prevent you from making any further contribution for that year, but I would have to check.

May 31st, 2007Committee meeting

Stephane Perrault

Procedure and House Affairs committee  This provision reflects the current regime for unpaid claims. The requirement you referred to is that there be a binding agreement—essentially a binding, enforceable contract—to show that this is actually a bona fide, genuine transaction that has taken place. That is the current

May 31st, 2007Committee meeting

Stéphane Perrault

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Yes, this will require showing the agreement, basically.

May 31st, 2007Committee meeting

Stéphane Perrault