Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 37
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

International Trade committee  The motion would read: That the Standing Committee on International Trade conduct extensive hearings on the implications of the Canada-Korea bilateral agreement currently being negotiated, specifically hearing testimony from a wide variety of sectors and diverse regions of Cana

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  Okay, “from a wide range of sectors”.

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  You said you had kept “diverse regions”.

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  Yes,“and diverse regions of Canada, and that the committee investigate alternative”--

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  Okay: “and that the committee report to the House”. You're moving that part as well?

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  That wasn't in the original motion.

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  We have: That the Standing Committee on International Trade conduct extensive hearings on the implications of the Canada-Korea bilateral agreement currently being negotiated, specifically hearing testimony from a wide variety of sectors and diverse regions of Canada And the r

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  If I understand Mr. Pallister correctly, the motion would read as follows: That the Standing Committee on International Trade conduct extensive hearings on the implications of the Canada-Korea bilateral agreement currently being negotiated, specifically hearing testimony on a

November 22nd, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk of the Committee

International Trade committee  I can read the passage that deals with supplementary reports from the book if you like. I'll just read this passage. It might be able to clarify it in the other committee. It's just a quick paragraph. A committee report reflects the opinion of the committee and not that of the

November 15th, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  The amended motion reads: That every party shall have the right to attach, as an annex, a dissenting or supplementary opinion on any report to be presented to the House of Commons by the committee; and that this dissenting or supplementary opinion shall be submitted to the cler

November 15th, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  Standing Order 108(1), which is the standing order that's referred to, essentially just explains that a committee has the power, if it so chooses, to append dissenting or complementary opinions to any report it chooses. So it's not binding. There's no standing order that governs

November 15th, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  That was the motion that was adopted in the last session. The standing order simply says that the committee shall be...empowered...to report from time to time and to print a brief appendix to any report, after the signature of the chair, containing such opinions or recommendat

November 15th, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  Essentially the difference, Mr. Chair, is that a dissenting opinion essentially differentiates from what the committee has decided on, and a supplementary opinion is essentially just going a little bit further, not necessarily disagreeing with what's in the report, but adding cer

November 15th, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

International Trade committee  They're established by the liaison committee.

November 15th, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk

November 15th, 2007Committee meeting

The Clerk