Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee Last year, when projects were going ahead in the oil sands and investments were being made, the outlook was that in the next ten years we were going to see $150 billion in investment, generating over $1 trillion in economic opportunity. Most of that would be open for manufacturer
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee When you look at sector-by-sector productivity numbers, the differences really stand out in two areas--machinery and equipment and information technology. We lag behind in those two areas as well as in some areas of pharmaceuticals. In auto, in metals, in plastics, in paper and
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee Right now we're seeing productivity increase in manufacturing simply because we're seeing less competitive companies disappear. So overall we're seeing an increase in productivity in the sector, but when you look at operational process measures like work in progress as a percenta
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee We do have some of the most lucrative tax credits for industrial research and development and business research and development, but I think one of the shortcomings of the system we have is the fact that these tax credits are not refundable. That means if you're making investment
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee I will give you an example. One of the great things I do in my job is I get to visit all these manufacturing companies and see what really is going on. If you go out to the Gilbey's distillery in Lethbridge--I also like to visit distilleries and breweries--this is one of the bigg
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee We've been proponents of a Canadian content preferment for procurement—and it would not be possible at the federal level, but at provincial or local levels—to at least afford Canadian suppliers the type of access American suppliers have. Part of that is the transparency of the pr
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee I would also say that the NAFTA offers Canadian manufacturers and exporters tremendous opportunity and protection within the North American economy, but it doesn't cover everything here. From the point of view of the threat of opening up NAFTA, whether that would change our level
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee I think the impact on production and employment lies ahead, and I think for the rest of this year it's going to be a very challenging period of time for manufacturing. I hope the worst is behind us in terms of the downturn in orders, but the adjustment to that, which is what affe
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee Maybe I could take a first crack at that. I think one very important reason is that we don't have the global companies and the ownership of the global companies that are doing the R and D. One of the benefits of our relationship with an awful lot of multinational companies is th
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Subcommittee on Canadian Industrial Sectors committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. Maybe I've been around CME too long. I remember back in the recession of the early 1990s when I was debating with the Fraser Institute about the demise of manufacturing. This was one year before the manufacturing sector in Canada experienced its fastest gro
April 21st, 2009Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Finance committee But that itself depends on industry continuing to spend on R and D and new technology. We hear a lot about receptor capacity. If I have a business and talk about receptor capacity, it means I have something my customers don't want. It offers no solution. Maybe that's true of th
March 5th, 2008Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Finance committee The bigger companies are certainly more capable of finding out where the research is and working with industry. I think most of the big companies do that very well, but not only from Canada, from around the world.
March 5th, 2008Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Finance committee I think that's right. We've certainly been in support of value-added taxes as the way to go, rather than embedded taxes. In many cases this is a fixed cost that industry has to pay. That's not the way to run an efficient or effective tax system. Another set of fixed costs—here's
March 5th, 2008Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Finance committee No, it's the most important. This is where the money is spent, in the prototype development, the engineering, the scale-up. If you don't do that, you can't do this--
March 5th, 2008Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers
Finance committee It's the same for manufacturing.
March 5th, 2008Committee meeting
Dr. Jayson Myers