Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 241-255 of 270
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  It's a very good question, Mr. Chairman. Again, I would turn back to Scott as to whether there's any evidence that, because of a failure to run a security requirements checklist or to classify a project, we have incurred additional expenses as a result. Just to make sure, becaus

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  No, I'm just saying that it could, in that eventuality, actually result in further modifications and further costs.

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Not as far as I know.

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  May I try to clarify? The current process is build the shell. Generally, it's essentially seen to not be classified because it's a shell with some plumbing and some wiring. As the vice-chief or Colonel Day suggested, as you move into fitting up or creating classified areas withi

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Mr. Chairman, again, let me make sure I understand the question clearly. Maybe the Auditor General understands it more clearly than I do. These documents were unclassified. The government security policy does not require unclassified documents to be handled in any particular wa

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  I'll just take the afterglow from the Auditor General here. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Yes. I'd be happy to, Mr. Chairman. Actually, I will ask the departmental security officer to speak to it. Just before I do, though, I will address the question that a previous member was asking and that the Auditor General actually answered. We are attempting to address that qu

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Mr. Chairman, on the issue of U.S. confidence, the U.S. is, as I understand it, very comfortable with the state of that building and its actual use. They have sent their own teams to have a look at that building. So they are now very comfortable. The only thing I would say in r

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Mr. Chairman, on the issue of document handling and classified documents, there is already a very clear process in place for how classified documents are to be handled, who is to have access to them, the kinds of security clearances they actually require--

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Mr. Chairman, first of all, on the issue of the review that is being done by the chief of review services--an error perhaps of omission that we did not inform the clerk, certainly not an error of commission--the timing of that review was always intended. I don't remember exactly

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Just as clarification, my comment was with respect to North Bay.

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  I apologize. I should be clear that in this context our investigation immediately, as soon as this became apparent through the newspapers, showed no breach of any policy.

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg

Public Accounts committee  Mr. Chairman, I assume we're referring to North Bay, not to the Trenton blueprints.

June 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Robert Fonberg