Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-40 of 40
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  That's correct. If you're trying to figure out the connection between the environmental mandate of the organization and the Navigable Waters Protection Act, those two really do go hand in hand going back 2,000 years, as I tried to articulate but maybe not well enough. The reason

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  The boating community is really important. Every area you go to, you have a slightly different community. For the Ottawa River, there's an Ottawa Riverkeeper program. That's one of the world's greatest rafting rivers. There's a strong boating community there that has very partic

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  The American system is completely different from the Canadian system when it comes to environmental protection. They have the Clean Water Act, which actually encourages citizen involvement. And it encourages big lawsuits, which to Canadians sounds extremely litigious and very con

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  So conceptually, just making sure that the broader the definition is to protect future uses...that's what we're hearing from the public is really important.

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  I grew up in Oshawa, Ontario, which is on Lake Ontario just outside of Toronto. It's a fairly industrial city. I grew up in an environment where we assumed that Lake Ontario was supposed to be dirty. We assumed that the Oshawa Creek was not supposed to be something that we would

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  I see your point. Without having a proposed definition to work from, it is difficult for us. In our recommendations we did suggest that if the transport committee or Transport Canada is very committed to moving forward with these amendments, a more specific wording should be prov

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  In response, there are a couple of examples. There's the Don River in Toronto. It would be questionable whether or not the Don River is considered a navigable waterway. My hunch would be that most people would consider it a minor waterway. It's navigable once a year when it's flo

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  Yes, that would be a grave concern. One of the reasons I chose the Petitcodiac River as an example is that the federal government did do an environment impact assessment on that river. The findings were that if the causeway were removed, the river would be completely restored, an

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  By way of illustration, I'll give you the story that Mr. Kennedy tells about the founding of the Hudson Riverkeeper, which was the first public interest Riverkeeper organization on the planet. In the 1960s the Hudson River was completely destroyed. The fish were inedible. The pla

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully

Transport committee  Thanks. I believe you all have a copy of the brief that Lake Ontario Waterkeeper submitted. I'll just walk you through our proposals and our comments from that brief. As well, I have had an opportunity to review some of the transcripts from the previous committee hearings, so I

May 29th, 2008Committee meeting

Krystyn Tully