Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Finance committee Yes.
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee Perhaps you could help me and tell me which part.
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee For exemptions that would now be introduced in the act and that are in the regulations, as I mentioned previously, a body of experience is developed by those federal departments and agencies. They assess these types of projects for a period of 14 years to demonstrate, based on th
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee Let's start with the parliamentary review of the act, which is, as you know—and that's what you were referring to—a statutory requirement that was added to the amendments to the act at the end of the last review of it in 2003. This is still a requirement. Part 20 of this bill doe
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee I don't think he has any question, so I'm not sure.
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee Essentially, when I mentioned that, I was referring to a broad consensus among stakeholders, many of whom had been asked about and had supported consolidating those responsibilities to do environmental assessment in a central organization. The reason for that is that you end up w
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee As we speak, Mr. Mulcair, these projects are excluded by regulation. If one of those projects were to raise environmental concerns, it would remain excluded. With the proposals contained in Part 20, the minister of the environment would have the power to require an environmental
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee That's not what the experience acquired by Transport Canada and Infrastructure Canada shows.
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee Yes.
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee With regard to the three components covered by the bill and the exclusions, as I said, experience acquired over a period of 15 years shows that these projects cause no major effects. They have been excluded for a year and will continue to be excluded. Let's talk about assigning
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee There's nothing in Part 20 that provides for a transfer of responsibilities to the National Energy Board. The National Energy Board's responsibility for environmental assessments will remain essentially the same, even if Part 20 is adopted. Part 20 states that the responsibilitie
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee To what aspects of Part 20? I have a different take on Part 20, but is there something particular in Part 20 that enables you to draw that conclusion?
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee The proposal that we consolidate the environmental assessments in advance, which is included in Part 20, is a longstanding request by all sectors and stakeholders.
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee Why they would not be?
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf
Finance committee As we mentioned earlier, those projects and classes of projects were excluded a year ago by regulation. The rationale at the time was essentially based on the experience acquired mostly by Transport Canada and Infrastructure Canada involved in conducting environmental assessments
May 5th, 2010Committee meeting
Yves Leboeuf