Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee I presume so. I will have to follow up. As I said, this is not one of the things currently on my file.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee Yes, there are some final comments. When we started this process, Prime Minister Harper came to the Yukon very soon after he was elected, and he said to the Yukon and to these areas that these modern-day treaties were an opportunity for Canada and for the first nations to really
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee I haven't been made aware of it, so as far as I know, it hasn't.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee Thank you.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee We've not heard back on it, so I'm hoping it's going forward.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee No, it doesn't. None of our claims has a value of over $150 million. They're all under $150 million. In terms of the specific claims process, under $150 million is what we're discussing.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee Sorry, I didn't catch all of your question.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee Do you mean on the specific claims? Is that correct? Are you referring to a negotiator for the specific claims? That's a specific claim process. Sorry, I didn't hear your comment.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee No, one wasn't appointed, because it's been a tribunal. We have some legal counsel monitoring it, but there is no negotiation on it. It's a specific claim. That's a dialogue we need, right? We're not quite sure of what's happening or some of the reasons it's been rejected and w
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee As has been pointed out, two of them have been rejected. If the specific claims process has been set up to make things more efficient, and if the efficiency is to reject the claims, it's not efficient for us. We need to have more dialogue and more input as to why they've been rej
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee That's correct.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee Not yet, no. I will follow up. We've been focusing on some other areas, but I know we'll follow up with their legal counsel, because obviously these are important areas to us. Unfortunately, there are a whole bunch of things that we have to address as a first nation.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee I believe so, yes.
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge
Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee Well, this is where I say that if the efficiency is to drop these options or reject them, it's not more efficient for us. I'd rather have more time than just drop them off. I don't believe that we had enough grounds. There was other information; oftentimes the court process woul
February 10th, 2011Committee meeting
Chief Mark Wedge