Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Human Resources committee It really is a timing issue, insofar as by the time the decision was made to renew the programs, basically the expenditure profiles, which are the foundation for the main estimates, had been closed. So parliamentarians, members of the committee, will see the funding associated wi
May 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Human Resources committee In terms of the amounts for this year, the government renewed the program in September 2008, as I mentioned. The strategy was extended for two years, from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2011. Funding for the program will continue at the same level, that is, $134.8 million this year a
May 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Human Resources committee Allow me to answer Ms. Folco's question. The difference between last year's main estimates and this year's has to do with the end of the former homelessness program. The committee members will see the payments for this program, which the government renewed, in the supplementary
May 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Human Resources committee Perhaps I could help respond to Mr. Lessard's question.
May 5th, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee We give advice.
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee I'll come to the data in just one second. When I say access to regular benefits for individuals who leave their job for a valid reason, anybody in that kind of a situation would be eligible for regular EI benefits. It's a voluntary quit, because they were choosing to go on and do
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee We're involved with the Status of Women on a wide variety of topics. I'm not exactly familiar with the indicators work, but we can find out for you if you want, or inquire with Status of Women Canada.
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee Yes, we made recommendations.
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee Thank you very much.
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee Ms. Mathyssen, thank you for you question. I wouldn't want to leave the committee with the impression that I would declare victory on the economic security of women. Absolutely not. What I am saying, though, is that the situation is improving. As I said, we look at post-secondar
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee We are in the process of negotiating agreements with provinces and territories, who, as you said, will deliver the strategic training and transition fund. I know we're going to be tracking clients who benefit. Certainly for the employment benefits and supports to be delivered und
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee We'll take a note of that, though, Ms. Mathyssen. We'll get back to the committee about this.
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee The employment insurance program is designed as an insurance program for workers. I'm not sure it would necessarily lend itself to a different program for women over men. It really is looking at the labour force characteristics primarily. Could it be done? Parliament can choose
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee That's correct. To the extent that we change the benefit side of the equation, that would have implications for the premiums. I think if you were to have taxation experts before you, they would tell you that payroll-based taxes can actually be a disincentive to employment. One o
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette
Status of Women committee That depends very much on the design of the program, but I think we can safely assume, depending on what's contained in the package of special benefits and how it's designed....
April 2nd, 2009Committee meeting
Janice Charette