Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Finance committee Yes, that's right.
October 21st, 2010Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee That's true. That's correct, yes. Our industry I think functions well. You mentioned the passport. This is a system that works very effectively to monitor the regulation of small companies.
October 21st, 2010Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee I agree with that. The problem is that our securities regulation extends far beyond capital raising, and for those other reasons we've advocated a single regulator.
October 21st, 2010Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee The number we've talked about, and again it's simply an estimate, was about an allowability of about $150,000. So that would be roughly 15 years of being able to make retroactive contributions. Our number is $150,000. It is interesting that in the Senate banking committee recom
October 21st, 2010Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee Thank you, Mr. Pacetti. It's my pleasure to be here this morning. I have formal remarks, but I'll just talk a bit informally on the substance of my presentation. I'll preface my remarks by saying that while I think Canada faces some huge challenges in a very competitive global e
October 21st, 2010Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee It would capture a large number of companies. In fact, that would even understate the number that it would capture, because you'd then be encouraging companies that are staying private to list. So I think it would have a big impact.
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee You're quite right in terms of their not being used, but the fact is that they have been set up. They're there as standby facilities. It gives, I think, confidence to the marketplace. For example, the insured mortgage program was a very effective vehicle for providing a source o
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee Well, the minimum withdrawal is once the RRSP has been converted into an annuity, into an RRIF, and the problem right now is that there's a formula that stipulates a maximum withdrawal each year. If that's removed, it gives a lot more flexibility on simply withdrawing the funds f
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee I think if you provided the flexibility, the likelihood is that the tax take would be stretched out over a longer period of time, for sure.
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee I'm not sure. If it didn't and the individual died, then the tax would—
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee —be imposed at that point, anyway. But I think when you look at the cost benefit, I think the benefit to elderly Canadians to have that flexibility in their retirement years justifies doing it.
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee Again, it depends on how you measured. If you measured it in terms of the number of companies that would qualify—because what I'm suggesting here is that you target it into common shares of small companies—it would be the vast majority of companies. Even on the TSX listing, whe
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee Thank you for the question, Mr. McCallum. I guess the way I'd start my answer is to say that looking at RRSP usage, it seems to me that when we look at the aggregate numbers, you're right, a lot of Canadians are not using RRSPs the way one would anticipate. But if you look at it
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell
Finance committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate this opportunity to appear before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance to participate in this pre-budget consultation. Our association represents over 200 members firms, investment dealers that employ over 40,000 Canadians from c
October 22nd, 2009Committee meeting
Ian Russell