Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 151-165 of 167
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  Paragraph 7 does not refer to kilos or weight; rather, it refers to the number of plants. In your example, he would have to produce fewer than 201 plants for the purpose of trafficking in order for the six-month minimum sentence to apply.

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Well, I guess the question then is, what offence are we talking about here?

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  That's correct.

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Could I interject?

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  The problem is that giving a plant to someone is considered to be trafficking, under the definition of “trafficking”. And, if we are talking about trafficking, we are talking about quantities, volume and weight. Whether there is one plant or five plants, the important thing is th

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Yes, I do. We were talking about trafficking. We were talking about giving a plant to someone. When you give someone a plant, that is trafficking. However, if you are talking about an individual charged with producing or growing only one plant, there is no minimum sentence, beca

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  In the example I have here, and having read the transcript, it seems that the offence we are talking about concerns a young person engaged in trafficking.

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Yes, I follow you.

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Mr. Lemay, my colleague, Greg Yost, made me aware of your question. As I recall, you had asked whether an individual found trafficking one or two plants of marijuana would receive a minimum sentence. The answer is no, because he would be trafficking a quantity of marijuana that

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  The Department of Justice has undertaken some studies on minimum penalties, in 2002 perhaps, and one in 2006. That's the extent of the work I believe the department has undertaken in this area. There may be others, but I'm not aware of them.

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  I have brought no studies concerning the effects or impact of minimum penalties as a deterrent, or any other type of impact. So I have nothing here on that. But I believe Monsieur Ménard's question was whether or not I was aware of such studies. I am aware of a number of studies

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Certainly. The concern about medical marijuana, I believe, is covered by Health Canada's medical marijuana access regulations, where individuals are given a permit to grow it either for themselves or for another individual. So it would appear to me that this particular issue is

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Mr. Chairman, I believe Mr. Ménard's reading of this is absolutely correct. I have only just seen these amendments. As I understand them, they would eliminate all the current provisions relating to production in the bill. That would basically mean that the current provisions of t

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  As well, yes.

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis

Justice committee  Thank you for the compliments, Mr. Ménard. The concept found in this provision is already in the legislation at the present time. Subparagraph 10.2(iii) already talks about places usually frequented by young people. As for potential legal considerations in that regard, in my op

May 27th, 2009Committee meeting

Paul Saint-Denis