Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-6 of 6
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Natural Resources committee  I'll kick it off with one, and then I'll let my colleagues take it from there. The focus of the study, I think, shouldn't be on a whole bunch of individual technologies, because what we're talking about here, QUEST, is in its very nature about integrating across technologies. I

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Michael Cleland

Natural Resources committee  There's not a very precise answer to your question. Quite clearly our view is that there are some things in the budget that we think, as the programs are shaped, as they're developed, and as they're approved, can be done to make them effective in supporting the kinds of technolog

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Michael Cleland

Natural Resources committee  The final translation will be ready Monday.

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Michael Cleland

Natural Resources committee  I'm going to see if Mr. Lee wants to pick this one up, because this is close to his expertise, but maybe I'll make just a couple of points. It's going to depend on the circumstances, and density makes it easier. Mixed use makes it easier because you have different energy loads

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Michael Cleland

Natural Resources committee  I'm sorry, I'm not sure I can provide you an answer to that one. I guess maybe the right answer to it, though, is to the extent that we can engage more people in rural and small communities, that's how many resources will go into it. Part of our job is to get out to as many peopl

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Michael Cleland

Natural Resources committee  I would maybe just expand a little bit on Mr. Harcourt's answer. I think it's correct. Getting a precise answer to this is hard. On the other hand, if you're asking where the biggest bang for the buck is likely to come from, it's going to be new mixed-used development, because o

February 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Michael Cleland