Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-13 of 13
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Natural Resources committee  I'll provide a short response. Essentially the Nunavut Impact Review Board is responsible for conducting the environmental assessment. What the CNSC provides is the scientific and technical support for all aspects of the environmental assessment, and we play the role of coordina

May 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  Essentially, we looked at the characteristics of the steam generators in terms of the content of radioactivity and the characteristics of the generator in terms of the radionuclides, which are not soluble, so it's a coating inside the tubes that is not soluble in water. There are

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  We conducted two types of assessments to ensure workers are protected. The first scenario we developed focused on the drivers of the trucks making a round trip with the 16 generators. We concluded that the worker would be exposed to 0.02 mSv. The annual maximum permitted public d

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  Thank you. The 2006 environmental assessment was conducted for the retrofit of units at the Bruce Power plant. Waste management was only a small part of the assessment. The assessment was designed to ascertain whether the retrofit could be done safely without impact on the env

March 8th, 2011Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  It means to decrease.

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  That's right, so the CNSC does not use 7,000 as its limit for regulating the industry. The regulatory framework is based on the public dose limit but also on action levels and administrative levels, and the requirement for operators to take all reasonable precautions to operate a

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  Mr. Chair and members of Parliament, the standard that Canada has adopted, the 7,000 becquerels per litre, is based on recommendations from the World Health Organization. It is a safe standard. The dose associated with this level of tritium in drinking water.... If someone were t

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  Mr. Chair, member of Parliament, the State of California has a legally enforceable drinking water standard for tritium of 740 becquerels per litre. That's the same as other U.S. states. The 15 becquerels per litre is not an enforceable standard; it's what is being referred to—

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  That's correct.

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  To put things in perspective, of all the nuclear facilities operating in Canada, nuclear power plants, the Chalk River site, the level of tritium in drinking water supplies has always been below 20, and in most cases it is below 15. So although the guideline or the standard is 7,

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson

Natural Resources committee  Mr. Chair, my understanding is that there were two other commission proceedings related to the AECL Chalk River site. One was on an environmental assessment being conducted by the CNSC for the Chalk River site and the other one was on a licence amendment.

February 24th, 2009Committee meeting

Dr. Patsy Thompson