Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 27
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  Yes, it's costly. It would be a large cost to a fleet, especially a large fleet, because they would have to outfit all of their vehicles.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  For support in developing this in the trucking industry?

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  We have not. With GM coming into the market with a slowdown product, they will be developing a greater understanding and recognition of that kind of product into the market.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  They are ready to provide the trucking companies themselves with grants and contributions to in turn pay us to put this into practice.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  Our product can be installed for $500 to $1,200, depending on options. That is obviously only one of the grants that has been awarded and one of the ways of funding the installation that the U.S. government has provided.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  We've been involved with the NRC, the National Research Council, and the SR and ED tax credit. However, the NRC regularly runs out of money to provide for research and development companies. And because research and development is where a lot of the money goes before your product

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  Again, I'm not 100% sure on why we haven't made those efforts. We obviously should.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  I made a comment earlier today that I felt that the easiest market for us to enter was the U.S. because the studies had been done in the U.S., because governments were looking at mandating these kinds of technologies, and they have made those mandates. That's not to mention the f

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  There's GPS tracking that's provided through cell and satellite. Satellite obviously is more expensive, but that would take care of covering the remote area.

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  Actually, we feel that our system has quite a low cost compared to those that are out there at the moment. I'm not sure which part of it you're referring to. Are you referring to the call centre? Are you referring to the product itself, or to the monthly fees?

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  Currently, our tracking systems are on 500 vehicles within Canada. Worldwide, our tracking system is used on over 300 vehicles in 55 different countries. Our VST, our vehicle slowdown technologies, are going to be in production within the next 45 days. As I stated at the beginni

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell

Transport committee  In my review I saw portions that spoke of keeping track of vehicles. As one suggestion, we believe that needs to be more strongly worded or research needs to be done to be able to make the tracking available and mandated by the government. And, as well, the U.S. is going to manda

March 5th, 2009Committee meeting

Stephanie Mitchell